Live data from Hacker News

What is 'common sense'?

thelongandshort.org

41–44 of 44 posts

Re: What is 'common sense'?

#41
post #34
post #9

Common sense should not be defined as common knowledge. It is not describing a type of knowledge which one simply know or ignorant. Rather it describes a most general type of critical thinking process where common people will reach the similar conclusion when they are asked to engage in the critical thinking. For example, cutting vegetables. I would say it is a common sense to always put your holding figures on top (…

I've been thinking a lot about this lately, because some people in my life are exhibiting a great lack of common sense. I think common sense is the ability to correctly prioritize possible solutions to problems, or to prioritize desires vs needs vs abilities. I often see people incorrectly prioritize solutions because they let their emotion and desires get in the way. When this happens, usually something bad happens…

I can see where you're going with this and can agree with it, but feel like it's an incomplete definition. To use a quote (I think by Einstein, but I'm lazy and not looking it up): "Common sense is what tells you the Earth is flat." And it's true, this is "common sense", but it doesn't abide by your definition.

Re: What is 'common sense'?

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Considered objectively, it's the opposite of empiricism. It's not. Because we call it a sense, it might have nothing to do empirical senses. It has to do with what we believe about the world, including right and wrong. Common sense can be very well justified (the justification being outhere, although not all are aware of it), or it might be something seen on TV or read on HN. Perhaps it's fair to say that it's the…

Am I reading this wrong, or is cristianpascu basically saying he miss the good old days before minorities had rights?

Was kidding, man! :)

Re: What is 'common sense'?

#44

The phrase common sense is awful, as @robert_tweed says, it is the opposite of a considered opinion. In politics, however, this idea is particularly egregious, as the article elucidates. If you're wrong about a scientific theory or a computer program, you can tell well enough by testing the things. If you're wrong in politics, it is extremely difficult to obtain empirical evidence that this is the case. That is not t…

> The Lib Dems (who I stood for in the election) have actually tried to do the probably-impossible here and build a platform on evidence-based policy. Much good it did us in the poll, of course. Interesting you mention that. The Lib Dems didn't do the common sense thing: ditch their leader. Even after a bloodbath in the European elections, even after opinion poll after opinion poll showed considerable negativity towa…

If I'd had anything to do with it, they would have done.
Post reply on HN