Live data from Hacker News

Even with a VPN, open Wi-Fi exposes users

arstechnica.com

41–44 of 44 posts

Re: Even with a VPN, open Wi-Fi exposes users

#41
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Little Snitch is one of my favorite pieces of software, it is truly amazing how noisy most software is. Without it, your ISP knows even what programs you have open because they call home every 15 minutes for stupid reasons.

"... stupid reasons." Do you think developers assume you will not notice or will not care? In my experience, most if not all of this software uses DNS for the attempted dial outs. Running my own DNS makes blocking easy.

Both.

Re: Even with a VPN, open Wi-Fi exposes users

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I looked at PDANet and I don't realy understand... My Android phone (galaxy s6) can do all that by default under Settings->Tethering and Hotspot. I do live in Europe though and I've never heard about a "tether plan". Is that some American weirdness maybe?

I wasn't aware that it was an American weirdness, but phone carriers here can, and mostly do, charge us to tether our phone to another device [1]. There is at least one legal exception, where consumers whose data is transmitted via the 700 MHz frequency band can not be charged for tethering [2] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tethering#United_States_of_Ame... ; It looks like the U.K. has similar tethering charges […

That's really weird. It's just data?

Re: Even with a VPN, open Wi-Fi exposes users

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wasn't aware that it was an American weirdness, but phone carriers here can, and mostly do, charge us to tether our phone to another device [1]. There is at least one legal exception, where consumers whose data is transmitted via the 700 MHz frequency band can not be charged for tethering [2] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tethering#United_States_of_Ame... ; It looks like the U.K. has similar tethering charges […

That's really weird. It's just data?

Yes, and tethering charges are basically charging consumers twice for accessing that data. I ethically disagree with it, but it is the standard practice here and with one legal exception, it is a legally supported practice.
Post reply on HN