Live data from Hacker News

Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

techcrunch.com

21–30 of 125 posts

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#21
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep. Part of DMCA safe harbor is that you have to pull it down for a couple weeks, regardless of frivolity.

Google rejects many DMCA requests, does that mean they aren't covered under safe harbor?

For the DMCA they rejected and if the request is found to be valid, yes, they become potential party to the legal action.

I'm guessing they reject obviously spurious and incomplete/ill-formed ones.

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#22

It's not really a big deal but why do they need to say Indian programmer as apposed to just a programmer?

Because the story takes place in India, and since TechCrunch is an American publication, people would otherwise assume the story was taking place in the US.

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#23
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep. Part of DMCA safe harbor is that you have to pull it down for a couple weeks, regardless of frivolity.

Google rejects many DMCA requests, does that mean they aren't covered under safe harbor?

it means the people who made the request can sue google.

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#25
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you in the US and/or consuming primarily American media sources? I'd imagine the term might be more common in articles written in India and the term Indian programmer more common in articles written in the US.

I am in India. Never heard American programmer. Maybe Indian media doesn't cover much tech.

Interesting, thanks for the perspective. I wonder if the term is more common in any other countries or just uncommon in general. I can find a few examples googling but that doesn't really answer if it's common or not.

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#26
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep. Part of DMCA safe harbor is that you have to pull it down for a couple weeks, regardless of frivolity.

Google rejects many DMCA requests, does that mean they aren't covered under safe harbor?

Google is in the unusual situation of receiving a lot of blatantly invalid DMCA takedowns. Like, a movie studio (or a company under contract to them) will do a Google search for something broad, like "download game of thrones", and issue a mass takedown for every single link that shows up, often without even looking at the links. So a lot of perfectly legal content (e.g, a news article that says "Game Of Thrones is one of the most commonly downloaded TV shows") gets swept up, and Google is being good enough to spot those and reject them.

(Sometimes the DMCA agents screw up even worse. For instance, there's evidence that some of them forget important keywords sometimes, and end up issuing a takedown on all the top links for searches like "download".)

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#27
post #10
post #4

> and Github, for their part, cravenly pulled the code as part of DMCA request. That's a very weirdly-opinionated statement. Isn't GitHub legally required to obey the DMCA request?

[deleted]

No, it's absolutely not. Placing content in the public domain takes an explicit public domain dedication; simply making it available doesn't have that effect.

(Edit: Alternatively, content can enter the public domain if all copyrights on it have expired. But that's certainly not the case here either.)

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#28
post #10
post #4

> and Github, for their part, cravenly pulled the code as part of DMCA request. That's a very weirdly-opinionated statement. Isn't GitHub legally required to obey the DMCA request?

[deleted]

No, the code is still copyrighted by Networks Layer8 or Airtel.

Publishing or delivering it on request doesn't make it public domain.

Here is one definition of public domain: the status of a literary work or an invention whose copyright or patent has expired or that never had such protection.

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#29

Brief summary: Thejesh has accused Indian Airtel and Flash Networks Layer8 of something that may be a crime (depending on the particulars of Indian law) and is definitely a scandal. Specifically, the accusation is that Flash Networks Layer8 wrote a piece of malicious software and that Airtel injected it into customers' network connections. Thejesh republished the injected script on GitHub. Flash Networks sent a nasty…

Just because code/webpages are delivered to you over the web doesn't mean you can take them and republish them somewhere else.

Re: Indian Programmer Exposes Code Injection, Gets a Cease and Desist from Injectors

#30

I have never heard the term "American" programmer. Why?

Can we stop with the identity politics and use our brains for a while (and yes, recently I have figured out that they are mutually exclusive). It is Indian programmer because he is from India and a programmer. And the fact that the mobile operator is also in India is also relevant ... so what is happens is that Israeli company with the help of Indian mobile operator censors Indian programmer that has unearthed wrongdoing using US law.

The guys that were from Russia and tried on wall street were referred as Russians too.

Post reply on HN