Earlier quoted context omitted.
When people expect you to pay far below market rates for management (and sometimes expect it to be volunteer only), it is inevitable that you will suffer massive mismanagement. Even organizations with great management make massive expensive blunders.
ARC pays massive salaries
In Search of the Red Cross' $500M in Haiti Relief
211–215 of 215 posts
Re: In Search of the Red Cross' $500M in Haiti Relief
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was upset to hear that nearly $30 million of the tsunami relief money ended up subsidizing the Japanese whaling fleet. (Heard that on Whale Wars, so I'm not 100% sure it's true.)
$30M is what Percentage?
Most whalers were probably offshore when the tsunami striked thus not so damaged. I'll bet that this $30M where for families that lost their relatives or houses, instead to buy better whalers, but i'm just guessing...
Re: In Search of the Red Cross' $500M in Haiti Relief
#213Re: In Search of the Red Cross' $500M in Haiti Relief
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
Think about what an NDA actually usually accomplishes when you work for the government.
Looking back, my response was rude. I'm sorry about that. Yes, you don't have to look hard to find examples of government projects that are plagued by agency problems, incompetence, and grift. However, those exact same things play out in the private sector. They're problems endemic in /any/ large undertaking. You feel it's worse in the public sector. I feel it's just as bad in the private sector (just that it's repor…
In private sector, let's face it. Someone owns that business. The owner looses money if they are ineffective. Not all of us. Not all taxpayers. That's part of the reason why private business are better at not loosing too much money. Because this is Owner's money. He/she will make sure not too loose too much. Not to waste it. If he/she doesnt, more cost effective competition will take their place.