Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think using nice or renice is better practice. Hard throttling is way more inefficient.
It may be, but it doesn't solve some of the problems that cputhrottle does. My main use for cputhrottle is to limit the CPU usage of Flash. It's not that I want to use the CPU for something else, at least not at the moment, but I don't want my laptop's fans to turn on, the whole thing to heat up and it to kill my battery life. [re]nice will only allow another process to get CPU priority, it won't keep the CPU utiliza…
Show HN: Universal Pause Button
151–160 of 174 posts
Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe some window managers give the option of automatically focusing to the window under the cursor.
And once you're used to it you'll never want to go back. All of my experiences with focus-follow-mouse on commercial OSes have been almost-but-not-quite right.
Also, don't forget that OS X lets you scroll whatever window your mouse is over, even if it is "blurred" (not in focus). This is the one feature that I miss most whenever I need to use Windows.
Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think using nice or renice is better practice. Hard throttling is way more inefficient.
It may be, but it doesn't solve some of the problems that cputhrottle does. My main use for cputhrottle is to limit the CPU usage of Flash. It's not that I want to use the CPU for something else, at least not at the moment, but I don't want my laptop's fans to turn on, the whole thing to heat up and it to kill my battery life. [re]nice will only allow another process to get CPU priority, it won't keep the CPU utiliza…
Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#154Nice idea and app. Having a quick look at the code I had forgotten how much work needed to be done for old-skool Windows applications. They do give you great lean applications though which is something I miss. I will always have a soft spot for small, lean single function applications. I guess it takes me back to my UNIX days. Some of my favourite more modern programs are SumatraPDF, uTorrent (the older 2.x versions)…
Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
And once you're used to it you'll never want to go back. All of my experiences with focus-follow-mouse on commercial OSes have been almost-but-not-quite right.
Hover-focus is great on tiling window managers, but I'm not sure I'd react well to it where windows overlap by design. Also, don't forget that OS X lets you scroll whatever window your mouse is over, even if it is "blurred" (not in focus). This is the one feature that I miss most whenever I need to use Windows.
Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#156Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#157Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#158Great app but I have one request. Can you please modify it so instead of pausing the game until my SO is done talking, it pauses my SO until my game is done its cutscene? Thanks in advance.
Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe some window managers give the option of automatically focusing to the window under the cursor.
And once you're used to it you'll never want to go back. All of my experiences with focus-follow-mouse on commercial OSes have been almost-but-not-quite right.
The only people here who really seem to like it are the ones using drawing-tablets as their main input.
Re: Show HN: Universal Pause Button
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
450 kwords? That's like 2-3 large novels...
1984 was around 85,000 words (from memory). So 5 times that
450000 words * 5.1 bytes ≈ 2.2 MiB
I like to read novels on my phone in plaintext format. 2001 by Clarke is 368 kiB. Red Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson is 1.1 MiB.
1984 would be 423 kiB, which I consider pretty normal, not "large". But that's subjective, I guess.