> I think if I applied for a job I'd get rejected as there is no track record of being able to work with that tech. This is a big assumption, that is simply not true for a lot of opportunities out there. If you are able to show proficiency in what they are looking for, many companies will take you seriously as a candidate, even without 5+ years on the resume in said technology. Worst thing you can do for yourself is…
If this is the case, why do people put tech under the 'requirements' section, rather than the 'desired'? Hiring managers, you are going to get what you ask for.
At megacorps the relationship between the people writing reqs and the actual job are often rather strained.
I could never qualify for my own job req, and I work there. I got in via networking and portfolio. Seriously, HR lists specific versions of AS/400 software and the department doesn't even work that closely with the AS/400 group, ya know. In fact I think my AS/400 password expired, aged out so I need to regain access, although I really don't need it. People in my department "need" windows 8 experience but our desktops are win7? A+ certification preferred because everyone in my great-grand department requires it on paper? You listed the exact model number and firmware version of a specific spectrum analyzer from a company that is no longer in business under that name? Seriously?