For all Balmer's thing of dancing on a stage and chanting "developers", there was no point under Gates or he at which Microsoft felt like a pro-developer company. That has completely changed in the last eighteen months. Each time I think "wouldn't it be cool if" I'm finding a few weeks later that someone at Microsoft is well ahead of me. How much easier it will be to ship my sucky roguelikes to Windows users in this…
Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
81–90 of 404 posts
Re: Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
#82For all Balmer's thing of dancing on a stage and chanting "developers", there was no point under Gates or he at which Microsoft felt like a pro-developer company. That has completely changed in the last eighteen months. Each time I think "wouldn't it be cool if" I'm finding a few weeks later that someone at Microsoft is well ahead of me. How much easier it will be to ship my sucky roguelikes to Windows users in this…
Re: Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
#83Hell's not only freezing over, but freezing everything else with it. What a time to be alive.
Re: Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
#84This will definitely make my job easier! Or at least more convenient.
Re: Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
#85I happily await the day when I no longer need to install PuTTY on all of my fresh Windows installs.
Or worse, Cygwin, because of some obscure process that needs to connect via ssh to your Windows server...
Re: Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
#86For all Balmer's thing of dancing on a stage and chanting "developers", there was no point under Gates or he at which Microsoft felt like a pro-developer company. That has completely changed in the last eighteen months. Each time I think "wouldn't it be cool if" I'm finding a few weeks later that someone at Microsoft is well ahead of me. How much easier it will be to ship my sucky roguelikes to Windows users in this…
Cygwin has all of those things and ssh server support.
I ran cygwin-with-ssh heavily for a while in 2003. It was a hell of a thing to get it going. Then I had trouble getting it to work on a new computer and gave up. Shouldn't be surprised that it got good again.
Re: Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
#87Re: Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
#88For all Balmer's thing of dancing on a stage and chanting "developers", there was no point under Gates or he at which Microsoft felt like a pro-developer company. That has completely changed in the last eighteen months. Each time I think "wouldn't it be cool if" I'm finding a few weeks later that someone at Microsoft is well ahead of me. How much easier it will be to ship my sucky roguelikes to Windows users in this…
Cygwin has all of those things and ssh server support.
Re: Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
[deleted]
While I agree that a native terminal/ssh client is the best solution, putty is very much maintained still: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/changes.ht... last change was in February of 2015