I for one welcome our robotic overlord
I will celebrate AI Day. The day we were surpassed by our creation, in every way.
21–30 of 212 posts
I for one welcome our robotic overlord
I will celebrate AI Day. The day we were surpassed by our creation, in every way.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Personally, I'm not concerned with that. I'd be more concerned about powerful robots controlled by governments/corporations/anyonewhohasaninterestincontrollingyourbehaviour. Look at what's happening in Yemen. The population there lives under the fear of drone strikes by the US (that includes the civilian population). If governments are prepared to do that with drones, what reason is there to suspect they'll turn down…
I wish there was no reason for stupid warfare, but: Aren't they better off than the Vietnamese who lived under the fear of Napalm bombardment? (or, for that matter, Japanese fearing the atomic bomb) I don't think that robotics has significant negative impact on warfare (and I wonder whether it has a positive impact).
Those are (pretty clearly, IMO) war crimes.
But still, it's useful to be worried about the potential "desensitising effect" of remote warfare. Is someone operating a drone subject to the same psychological pressure to avoid killing other humans as someone pulling a trigger? (Turns out that yes, that person probably is, but that their political superiors possibly aren't).
Irony off.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Personally, I'm not concerned with that. I'd be more concerned about powerful robots controlled by governments/corporations/anyonewhohasaninterestincontrollingyourbehaviour. Look at what's happening in Yemen. The population there lives under the fear of drone strikes by the US (that includes the civilian population). If governments are prepared to do that with drones, what reason is there to suspect they'll turn down…
using something that's ground-based to impose control? I think we have that, they're called soldiers.
Sure the first generation won't replace all soldiers and they may never replace them all. We will need logistics and support people of course. Its not a perfect solution. But the second it becomes cheaper to put a robot in the place of a human on the battlefield.
They will.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Personally, I'm not concerned with that. I'd be more concerned about powerful robots controlled by governments/corporations/anyonewhohasaninterestincontrollingyourbehaviour. Look at what's happening in Yemen. The population there lives under the fear of drone strikes by the US (that includes the civilian population). If governments are prepared to do that with drones, what reason is there to suspect they'll turn down…
using something that's ground-based to impose control? I think we have that, they're called soldiers.
I for one welcome our robotic overlord
Seriously. Assuming humans are the pinnacle of intelligence (or anything) is so boring. I will celebrate AI Day. The day we were surpassed by our creation, in every way.
What a privilege it is to be subjugated by nature's sentient, motile organisms! My only regret is that these magnificant creatures don't sting me more often, but alas, it is the right of any autonomous insect to do whatever it wishes with it's sting, and who am I, but a lowly mammal, to coerce its gifts?
Aside from being a great development; I am really scared that robotics is improving this much. It feels like we are creating our own potential enemy.
If it was more rounded and animalish, maybe with a fur coloured coat of paint, I think it'd be a lot less scary.
DARPA again. Great to see more money flowing into military research. Irony off.
DARPA again. Great to see more money flowing into military research. Irony off.
Url changed from http://www.engadget.com/2015/05/29/oh-no-mits-cheetah-robot-... , which points to this.
A crap gif and half a paragraph add nothing to the video imho.