[deleted]
Google Design
21–30 of 193 posts
Re: Google Design
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well at least it loaded for me in Opera, unlike the Google I/O site which reminded me of the dark days of the single browser web.
Opera basically is dead though, so I don't think one can reasonably expect new websites to test for it. Now, if it didn't work in Firefox or IE11, then that would be significantly more questionable. Edit: I'm assuming we're talking about classic Opera, not the Chromium build that is currently called Opera but is actually Chromium.
Whatever happened to coding according to web standards? This isn't a small boutique shop that cannot afford testing, this is a huge multinational company.
Re: Google Design
#23"We're no longer controlling every pixel. It's more like jazz improvisation." Matias Duarte, VP Design @ Google. Super interesting concept. The abstraction of design.
Re: Google Design
#24Hmm. Material design is clicking twice on the play button to launch a Youtube video.
Re: Google Design
#25Re: Google Design
#26Am I the only one who gets a headache trying to decipher tile layouts like this? My eyes bounce back and forth and I still have no idea how the information is structured or what's important. I appreciate that Google is sharing all of this though.
(Firefox & Chromium. )
Re: Google Design
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's gonna get worse before it gets better.... http://beta.united.com/ It it a button? Or a dialog box? Maybe it's an ad. Flip a coin!
Exactly...I don't understand it :( The new Azure portal looks very similar and it's borderline unusable. Unless I'm just resistant to change and will eventually warm up to it but it seems to violate a lot of fundamental design principles.
Also closing 5 panels before opening a new one feels like a huge waste of time.
Re: Google Design
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Opera basically is dead though, so I don't think one can reasonably expect new websites to test for it. Now, if it didn't work in Firefox or IE11, then that would be significantly more questionable. Edit: I'm assuming we're talking about classic Opera, not the Chromium build that is currently called Opera but is actually Chromium.
That's exactly what people said with their "Designed for IE" websites back during 2000 to 2004. Whatever happened to coding according to web standards? This isn't a small boutique shop that cannot afford testing, this is a huge multinational company.
Hardly. Mozilla/Gecko may have been obscure at the time, but it was under active development. Opera is very definitely dead.
> Whatever happened to coding according to web standards?
So by "web standards" do you mean "older web standards supported by an outdated browser"?