Live data from Hacker News

“The benchmark numbers are completely wrong for both databases”

github.com

1–10 of 58 posts

Re: “The benchmark numbers are completely wrong for both databases”

#3

...forgot to call run().

It was rerun with that call: https://www.amon.cx/blog/rethinkdb-reviewed-by-a-mongo-fan/

Still we don't know the hardware, what versions were installed, configuration changes etc.

The whole thing is pretty meaningless.

Re: “The benchmark numbers are completely wrong for both databases”

#4
Benchmarking is hard and a lot of reports are bogus. However they are still very useful for a lot of developers.

Benchmarking programming languages got better. E.g.: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/ gives roughly idea about performance of programing languages.

I wish something similar existed for databases. I think exact figures would be hard to get, but I believe there are many 2x 10x differences that we should be aware of.

Re: “The benchmark numbers are completely wrong for both databases”

#5
> I expect to be able to click on a table and see the rows inside - like all the tools out there for Mongo, MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc.

He does have a point there. It is slightly annoying having to type out a query when I just want to browse the data. (No real biggie though..)

Re: “The benchmark numbers are completely wrong for both databases”

#8
Not sure what's worse here - people relying on third party benchmarks (hint: always do your own; see how a tool performs on your data, on your hardware, for your problem set), or the fanboy-ish panic when they are unsettled that a benchmark might make their chosen toy less shiny?
Post reply on HN