Live data from Hacker News

Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

monica-at-mozilla.blogspot.com

51–60 of 304 posts

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#51
post #4

For those wondering what Firefox tracking protection is - https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/tracking-protection-fir... From my, very quick, tests it appears to work quite well as a poor man's adblocker as well. Nice!

Just last week I opted in to Firefox's multiprocess branch, and one of my biggest complaints is that this breaks pretty much every extension. I eagerly welcome this if it can replace Ghostery.

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#52

I would love for Mozilla to find other means of funding online content besides advertising. In either case I'd love to see them take a hard stance on privacy and against tracking. They should block trackers that have no effect on website features and restrict and monitor the ones that do effect features. ...and this is another reason Mozilla needs to have their own search engine. They could have much greater influenc…

Do you think Mozilla has the resources to compete in that space, regarding Google's dominance? It seems that even Bing is unable to gain meaningful market share.

No. (At least not the way Google and Bing do it.) But they don't have the resources to compete with them in operating systems either and yet they are still trying because they see it as integral to their strategy to strengthen the Web.

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#53

I would love for Mozilla to find other means of funding online content besides advertising. In either case I'd love to see them take a hard stance on privacy and against tracking. They should block trackers that have no effect on website features and restrict and monitor the ones that do effect features. ...and this is another reason Mozilla needs to have their own search engine. They could have much greater influenc…

Huh? Mozilla has $307 million a year in revenu. Of that $300 million comes from Google in exchange for being the default search bar. So I'm not sure what you're talking about exactly. Edit: ok, revenue is from Yahoo now. That doesn't make me any less confused as to what parent reply meant though.

That deal is over. It's Yahoo! now.

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#54

I would love for Mozilla to find other means of funding online content besides advertising. In either case I'd love to see them take a hard stance on privacy and against tracking. They should block trackers that have no effect on website features and restrict and monitor the ones that do effect features. ...and this is another reason Mozilla needs to have their own search engine. They could have much greater influenc…

Huh? Mozilla has $307 million a year in revenu. Of that $300 million comes from Google in exchange for being the default search bar. So I'm not sure what you're talking about exactly. Edit: ok, revenue is from Yahoo now. That doesn't make me any less confused as to what parent reply meant though.

That $300 million is coming from Yahoo now, actually.

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#55
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then again Apple has a track record and APIs to put forward. Just about every API in iOS puts privacy first. If you want e.g. location data, the API asks the user's permission -- including with Apple's own apps.

How do I install any API from apple without providing Apple (and whoever else) with my credit card? The OsX machine at my office is mystifying, am I supposed to provide my personal credit card to apple to get security updates? That is more secure and insures more of my privacy than not entering my credit card into a system I don't trust? I view Apple as insulting my intelligence with promises of "convenience" that am…

Apple accounts are free. You can't use iTunes with a free account or get the premium developer offerings (i.e. iOS developer certs) but you don't need to pay to use the OS or get updates.

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#56
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then again Apple has a track record and APIs to put forward. Just about every API in iOS puts privacy first. If you want e.g. location data, the API asks the user's permission -- including with Apple's own apps.

How do I install any API from apple without providing Apple (and whoever else) with my credit card? The OsX machine at my office is mystifying, am I supposed to provide my personal credit card to apple to get security updates? That is more secure and insures more of my privacy than not entering my credit card into a system I don't trust? I view Apple as insulting my intelligence with promises of "convenience" that am…

"Create an iTunes Store, App Store, or iBooks Store account without a credit card or other payment method" https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204034

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#57
post #5

"To enable Tracking Protection in Firefox 35 and later, visit about:config and set privacy.trackingprotection.enabled to true" Edits - This quote from the article is interesting, especially considering Google the worlds biggest advertising industry company also has a browser. "That Firefox is first and foremost a user-agent, not an industry-agent"

Seems like a nice feature. I just enabled it and there's some overlap with ublock origin.

That is, when I load some pages with tracking protection and ublock, the number of requests blocked by ublock is smaller (but still far from 0).

After looking at Firefox log, it doesn't seem this feature blocks anything that was not blocked by ublock. But this might be wrong, I only tested a few sites, and I have no idea about the internals of these tools.

More knowledgeable info would be appreciated.

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#58
I'm surprised that Mozilla didn't enable this feature by default. They're either serious about differentiating themselves on the privacy front, or not. It's the every day users who need this protection, not the more advanced users who probably already use an adblock extension.

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#59
post #19
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple is supposedly getting into the search engine business. It'd be great if they and Mozilla got together, both companies believe in user privacy and could complement each other in getting things down

Apple believes in user privacy. Your naïveté is touching.

And your condescension is irritating.

Apple seems pretty solid on the protection of users' privacy. Devices are encrypted by default, for example, and there are robust protections from rogue applications in place.

Is there are specific practice that Apple engage in that makes you think they are particularly reckless regarding users' privacy?

Re: Firefox tracking protection decreases page load time by 44%

#60
Can anyone explain exactly what Firefox Tracking Protection does & doesn't do? The label "tracking protection" makes me think it might block analytics tools and retargeting/remarketing cookies, but this blog post seems to suggest that it might block advertising altogether.
Post reply on HN