Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: JavaScript Graphing Library Comparison

jsgraphs.com

91–100 of 117 posts

Re: Show HN: JavaScript Graphing Library Comparison

#91
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Baidu huh. Those plots looks really slick. IE6+ support is quite the accomplishment.

I agree with you. But why do you think IE6+ support is an accomplishment? Both FusionCharts and HighCharts also support IE 6+

RaphaelJS also supports IE6+

Re: Show HN: JavaScript Graphing Library Comparison

#94
post #79
post #27

I always rely on Highcharts, probably the biggest library presented here. Fit all the case (except map maybe) and flexible enough to let you change everything if you or your designer want something very specific !

Highcharts is beautiful but it's quite expensive for a startup in my country (VN). While the budget for a nascent webapp is around $1000. I choose Flot as the replacement. It's flexible and nice enough with responsive layout, compound charts, clearly script.

I used flot too, as a replacement for Highcharts.

The only downside I dislike about flot is that it depends on JQuery. As I otherwise don't rely on JQuery at all, it means another ~80kb of additional JS code. Beside that, flot seem to be a very good free alternative.

Re: Show HN: JavaScript Graphing Library Comparison

#96
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Baidu huh. Those plots looks really slick. IE6+ support is quite the accomplishment.

I agree with you. But why do you think IE6+ support is an accomplishment? Both FusionCharts and HighCharts also support IE 6+

I can vouch for that. I have been using FusionCharts[1] for some years now and I have never faced any browser compatibility issues. But I can understand Cyph0n sentiment here. It's amazing that they still support IE6+.

[1] http://www.fusioncharts.com/

Re: Show HN: JavaScript Graphing Library Comparison

#97

I find it wildly perplexing that there are so many frameworks and libraries for javascript graphics and data visualization. Wikipedia has a comparison matrix of 37 different libraries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_charti... Here is a list describing briefly at least 50 libraries: http://techslides.com/50-javascript-charting-and-graphics-li...

Palantir tried to solve this with Plottable. See their presentation from JsConf 2014 about this http://2014.jsconf.eu/speakers/dan-mane-why-are-there-so-man...

Re: Show HN: JavaScript Graphing Library Comparison

#98
post #94
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Highcharts is beautiful but it's quite expensive for a startup in my country (VN). While the budget for a nascent webapp is around $1000. I choose Flot as the replacement. It's flexible and nice enough with responsive layout, compound charts, clearly script.

I used flot too, as a replacement for Highcharts. The only downside I dislike about flot is that it depends on JQuery. As I otherwise don't rely on JQuery at all, it means another ~80kb of additional JS code. Beside that, flot seem to be a very good free alternative.

I started out with flot after noticing the high cost of Highcharts. But now have been switching out flot with dimple.js and d3.js. The charts are much better with dimple/d3.

Re: Show HN: JavaScript Graphing Library Comparison

#99
post #92

What are the advantages of SVG or Canvas in that use case? Which one (SVG, Canvas) is principle faster on current browser with thousands of data points?

Canvas is faster, as it basically is just a bitmap, while an SVG chart with a million points would correspond to at least a million DOM elements.

Re: Show HN: JavaScript Graphing Library Comparison

#100
post #98
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I used flot too, as a replacement for Highcharts. The only downside I dislike about flot is that it depends on JQuery. As I otherwise don't rely on JQuery at all, it means another ~80kb of additional JS code. Beside that, flot seem to be a very good free alternative.

I started out with flot after noticing the high cost of Highcharts. But now have been switching out flot with dimple.js and d3.js. The charts are much better with dimple/d3.

Interesting. I considered graph libs based on-top of D3. But D3 is equally big in JS file size to JQuery. And SVG wasn't supported in older Android (2.3) and slower in Firefox and Chrome 3 years ago. So flot with its Canvas rendering "won" in the end.
Post reply on HN