Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

nytimes.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 52 posts

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#41

Post by enraged_camel »

louisphilippe wrote: post #31
mhays wrote: post #20

To cite my own experience, I pay around $30,000 a year for my instate J.D. program. My school-appointed mentor, who graduated in 2004, paid $4,000 a year. I see this as unfair, not only in the sense that my generation has to take out extraordinary loans to access education, but also in the sense that I am forced to pay $100,000 just to participate in our justice system. And I am one of the lucky ones benefiting from…

My school-appointed mentor, who graduated in 2004, paid $4,000 a year. I see this as unfair, not only in the sense that my generation has to take out extraordinary loans to access education, but also in the sense that I am forced to pay $100,000 just to participate in our justice system. Abraham Lincoln could become a lawyer simply by studying books from the library and passing the bar exam. No tuition was needed. Vi…

>>Abraham Lincoln could become a lawyer simply by studying books from the library and passing the bar exam. No tuition was needed.

Yes, but I have a feeling that the legal field was several orders of magnitude less complex during Lincoln's time.

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#42

Post by danieltillett »

itsybitsycoder wrote: post #25
danieltillett wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well I am not sure if the USA needs anymore lawyers. If I were in charge I would make the tuition $500,000 pa and use the money to pay court appointed defence attorneys a decent wage and give them a reasonable workload. Fewer lawyers and more justice.

I'm not sure if having a justice system run entirely by children of the wealthy would result in more justice... because that's what you're going to get if tuition costs $2mil.

I am glad to see at least some people bothered to respond to my proposal rather than blindly down voting. Actually if tuition was $2 million and the only decent paying law jobs were in the public defenders office all the good people would rack up big debts and then go and work there. We would end up with fewer lawyers over all and those that we did have would be working in the areas we need more lawyers.

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#43

Post by danieltillett »

mhays wrote: post #35
danieltillett wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well I am not sure if the USA needs anymore lawyers. If I were in charge I would make the tuition $500,000 pa and use the money to pay court appointed defence attorneys a decent wage and give them a reasonable workload. Fewer lawyers and more justice.

I understand all the negative feelings our society has towards lawyers, and I don't blame anyone for having them. But there are a lot of us who are entering the profession because we have a sincere desire to do good. I also think that if you talk to those interested in justice equity, especially public defenders, they will tell you that, while there may be too many lawyers in some places, there are many, many underpr…

This is exactly my point. We have too many lawyers in areas we don't need them and not enough good ones in the area like public defenders that we do. We would have no problem getting good lawyers in the public defenders office if the job payed well and they were given the time to do their job well.

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#44

Post by danieltillett »

Retra wrote: post #37
danieltillett wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well I am not sure if the USA needs anymore lawyers. If I were in charge I would make the tuition $500,000 pa and use the money to pay court appointed defence attorneys a decent wage and give them a reasonable workload. Fewer lawyers and more justice.

Money is only a barrier if you aren't significantly wealthy. That's tautological enough that you should understand why your proposal doesn't help anything.

Sure it would be a barrier - that is the whole point. We need to stop training so many lawyers and have the ones we do train be well paid in the positions where we need good lawyers (i.e. public defenders). My proposal solves both problems :)

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#45

Post by danieltillett »

yequalsx wrote: post #27
danieltillett wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well I am not sure if the USA needs anymore lawyers. If I were in charge I would make the tuition $500,000 pa and use the money to pay court appointed defence attorneys a decent wage and give them a reasonable workload. Fewer lawyers and more justice.

You have missed mhays' point. Focusing on what you perceive to be a problem of an abundance of lawyers detracts from the essence of the issue. Namely, "... in the sense that my generation has to take out extraordinary loans to access education..." Unless you think every field has an over supply, what is the point of your comment?

Of course I don't think every field has an oversupply of graduates (most recent graduates do though), but I do think tuition fees can be used by society to encourage people into areas we need rather than in areas we don't need more people. Discouraging more people from becoming lawyers and encouraging those that do to work in areas we need good lawyers is a double positive from my perspective.

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#46

Post by mhays »

aswanson wrote: post #39
mhays wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>There is zero reason why entry needs to be mediated through expensive academic institutions staffed by professors who are generally not practitioners. If people want to go to law school as a luxury, that is fine, but it should not be required to participate in the justice system. I would have agreed with you before I came to law school, but now I see why having intense legal training before being able to practice is…

And yet, programmers, with far less forgiving requirements, manage to accomplish as much against far more objective requirements. Your comment seems to convey your field is riddled with political bullshit.

>And yet, programmers, with far less forgiving requirements, manage to accomplish as much against far more objective requirements.

I am unsure what you mean by "far less forgiving requirements." My client may go to jail, or have something else taken from them with the force of law. The stakes are very serious.

I'm also unsure how one can calculate who accomplishes more, since the two professions accomplish very different things. Does your sentiment stem from a distaste for lawyers, or for our legal system more broadly?

>Your comment seems to convey your field is riddled with political bullshit.

I'm sorry that I gave that impression, and I'm sorry you feel that way. Participating in a system that imprisons people and forcefully takes away assets by court order is inherently political. I suppose if you took to studying law and our legal system, you would soon see that as much is it is "riddled with political bullshit," it is also riddled with people trying to make the right decisions.

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#47

Post by beagle3 »

Americans should consider studying abroad. In most european countries, you will not (as an american) qualify for free university, but the costs are in the order of 20% or so of the US ones.

E.g., according to [0], tuition in Sweden will cost you some $10,000/year. And, it's an adventure that you're less likely to have the opportunity for later in life.

[0] https://studyinsweden.se/study-information/fees-and-costs/

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#48

Post by Retra »

danieltillett wrote: post #44
Retra wrote: post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Money is only a barrier if you aren't significantly wealthy. That's tautological enough that you should understand why your proposal doesn't help anything.

Sure it would be a barrier - that is the whole point. We need to stop training so many lawyers and have the ones we do train be well paid in the positions where we need good lawyers (i.e. public defenders). My proposal solves both problems :)

High school costs doesn't imply high pay afterword. And I don't see how having fewer people with in depth knowledge of our legal system will make it harder to exploit and manipulate.

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#49

Post by danieltillett »

Retra wrote: post #48
danieltillett wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure it would be a barrier - that is the whole point. We need to stop training so many lawyers and have the ones we do train be well paid in the positions where we need good lawyers (i.e. public defenders). My proposal solves both problems :)

High school costs doesn't imply high pay afterword. And I don't see how having fewer people with in depth knowledge of our legal system will make it harder to exploit and manipulate.

Fewer lawyers means less law suits.

The manipulation of the legal system comes from the law being made so complex that only lawyers can understand it. If we had fewer lawyers we would have a simpler legal system.

Re: The In-State Tuition Break, Slowly Disappearing

#50

Post by aswanson »

mhays wrote: post #46
aswanson wrote: post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet, programmers, with far less forgiving requirements, manage to accomplish as much against far more objective requirements. Your comment seems to convey your field is riddled with political bullshit.

>And yet, programmers, with far less forgiving requirements, manage to accomplish as much against far more objective requirements. I am unsure what you mean by "far less forgiving requirements." My client may go to jail, or have something else taken from them with the force of law. The stakes are very serious. I'm also unsure how one can calculate who accomplishes more, since the two professions accomplish very diffe…

Good comment, unlike mine. Sorry for that stupid post, too late to delete it. I was drinking when I wrote that...drunk people make incoherent, illogical statements at times...
Post reply on HN