Live data from Hacker News

In 1962, a college student answers an ad: “Mortuary Assistant required”

laphamsquarterly.org

91–98 of 98 posts

Re: In 1962, a college student answers an ad: “Mortuary Assistant required”

#91
post #2

>"The black lungs of heavy smokers I would weigh once, then squeeze under cold running water for fifteen minutes until they became baby pink and tripelike, and then weigh again: the difference in the two figures, often a couple of pounds or more, was the weight of the tar and nicotine that quite possibly was the killer." A few pounds ? If you'd asked me, I would have guessed the weight of lung-accumulated smoking gun…

Modern LA is orders of magnitude safer than London in the '60s and earlier. Those conditions would have been comparable to some parts of China today.

Pittsburgh was a city of coal-heated homes and coke-powered blast furnaces set in river valleys, and in the '60s and earlier was dark at noon: http://www.buzzfeed.com/kevintang/stunning-photos-of-pittsbu...

Many of the older brick-and-stone buildings are still covered in black stains.

Re: In 1962, a college student answers an ad: “Mortuary Assistant required”

#92
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Dick van Velzen did great harm Whilst I agree he comitted a crime, his subjects were all dead anyways. I don't see the great harm myself tbh.

His science was lousy; he caused many people to withdraw consent for tissue donation for scientific reasons. His subjects were dead but those subjects had relatives and many of them expressed considerable distress. I don't particularly understand that upset by I recognise that they were not lying, they did sincerely feel a lot of upset.

Your second point is not a consequence of the act itself, but a consequence of making it public. What if they never learnt about?

Re: In 1962, a college student answers an ad: “Mortuary Assistant required”

#93
post #81
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see where you're coming from with your argument, and certainly I have no qualms about the use of my organs after I die, but not everyone shares that belief and personally I don't think it's right to just disregard that. Sure, it might have been better if the families never found out, but it would have been best if the families wishes (no matter how irrational) were respected from the get-go.

Disregarding irrational beliefs is the first step to making good decisions.

One man's irrational beliefs are another man's rational.

Re: In 1962, a college student answers an ad: “Mortuary Assistant required”

#94
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this what inspired the organ donation skit in Montey Python's The Meaning of Life?

The Meaning of Life was released in 1983.

Oh I missed the dates, I thought it an incident from the 60s when the article takes place.

Re: In 1962, a college student answers an ad: “Mortuary Assistant required”

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whilst a mask seems a good idea, I presume that the organic material that built up in your lungs would be broken down and washed out by the lungs natural processes within a few days or weeks? Perhaps a doctor could clarify?

Not a doctor but.. You're falling for a bit of a naturalistic fallacy here. Just as Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral however inhaling its dust can come with very serious health problems, so can hay contain mould which can also cause serious lung disease. http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/diseases/farmers_lung.html

Chris is absolutely right, and in addition to mo(u)ld, there's also tons of antigens to provoke inflammatory responses in the lungs, which can lead to asthma and chronic bronchitis.

Re: In 1962, a college student answers an ad: “Mortuary Assistant required”

#97
post #86
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disregarding irrational beliefs is the first step to making good decisions.

Without irrational beliefs there is no meaning to life.

I don't see how that is even a remotely justifiable belief.
Post reply on HN