Earlier quoted context omitted.
My initial comment was only intended to remind people that it was in fact a blogazine that was declaring the death of blogs and the rise of blogazines. I don't mean to dissuade anyone from actually reading the article for themselves, we just need to be aware of whose opinions we're listening to. If you're going to criticize someone for "missing the point" you should at a minimum explain what it is they don't get, tha…
smashingmagazine.com is NOT a "blogazine" as defined by the article. This one post is the exception.
So smashingmagazine.com, the blog/magazine, is not a "blogazine" as defined by...them? Thanks for your insight.