Live data from Hacker News

Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

shapeoftheweb.mozilla.org

61–70 of 103 posts

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#61
post #53
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't get your comment (even sarcastically). It's not that big, but it's still a problem. People who are trying to avoid being tracked would probably prefer not being tracked. The page is self-defeating.

Well I do! Complaining about a moz site having google analytics is 100% bike shedding, everyone has an opinion because they have no idea how to fix or address the bigger issues, so lets complain about a website, we all know how to do that! If we cannot pick our battles, then we will just lose because of the dissipation of all of our efforts across everything "that is still a problem". When I weigh out the benefits vs…

Mozilla isn't some bystander, they're a major player in the fight against mass surveillance. That's why it gets such a big reaction when they seem to be enabling it. People start doubting their whole commitment to the cause.

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#62
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"If you're not paying for it, you're the product being sold."

That's simply not true, see Gnu or Linux.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/privacy-ubuntu-1210-am...

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#63

When you open a freshly installed Firefox on Ubuntu or Windows (that is where I checked) you will have a google cookie set right before the first usage, without any chance of opting out or being asked before. Yes, anybody can change the startpage, delete all cookies and restart the browser. How many users will do this? And does forcing every user into google surveillance comply with this privacy marketing of mozilla,…

Is this due to the Safe Browsing database? http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/02/28/the-google-cookie-tha... If so then it shouldn’t be present in current versions. Did you accidentally import cookies from another browser? Probably worth filing a bug if not.

> it shouldn’t be present in current versions

This is what I see at launch[1]:

    http://clients1.google.com/ocsp
    https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/download?...
[1] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/585534/7666597/5f...

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#64
post #47
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>AWstats is not that hard, and the AWstats output is quite good for most purposes. You haven't done any serious web analytics at scale, have you?

You're missing the point so comprehensively I have to conclude it's deliberate.

Huh, am I? Has anyone offended by this "transgression" of privacy by Mozilla thought this through to its logical conclusion? Let's see.

1. Mozilla is one of the good, independent orgs that don't have profit as their main goal. They do fight for the interests of the community at large.

2. If they remove third-party analytics from their web properties, Mozilla instantly loses valuable actionable insights that significantly increase their efficiency as an organization. Creating a viable alternative to Google Analytics is practically impossible for Mozilla due to lack of resources.

3. If Mozilla loses operational efficiency, Google/Microsoft becomes more powerful and are able to obtain more users for Chrome/IE. They use all analytics they need. Less users for Mozilla means less income from search engine deals and less influence.

4. No meaningful privacy increase for users is achieved, Google Analytics is now installed on (billions - 1) websites.

So. You want a non-profit with proven track record of shipping great software and protecting the interests of individuals to take a significant hit in the name of hard-line ideological principle that won't really benefit the users.

I guess I am missing the point.

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This isn't the 90s. AWstats is not a solution for web analytics. Funnels, Segmentation, Retention, Path Visualisation, Event Tracking. These are basic features used by marketing teams every day. And rolling your own solution with something like Hadoop (which would need for Mozilla sized traffic) is a big undertaking.

Tools like AWStats might not be up to the job, but there are other tools that do offer these kinds of features without sending data to Google. There's no need to roll your own just to do decent analytics without using Google Analytics.

Care to back up your claims with some links?

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#66
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"If you're not paying for it, you're the product being sold."

That's simply not true, see Gnu or Linux.

As a developer for one open source project:

In my case, I am doing it because the users are happy about it.

The users satisfaction with how the product works is my pay for spending all my weekends coding – and it’s definitely worth it.

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#67
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

RequestPolicy and other tools like HTTPS Switchboard or even Ghostery let you block all content from certain domains, not just JS. They won't even load a tracking pixel. RP is whitelist-based and it can take some time to enable all the domains you actually use. Ghostery is blacklist-based and targets known tracking domains.

I run Ghostery as well, but I learned something new, never heard of tracking pixels. I've added RequestPolicy to my suite!

Ghostery should be blocking that sort of content (that's the point), but I really like NoScript and RequestPolicy in conjunction with each other for the control it gives me. Configure firefox to ask to allow flash, and you've got a pretty complete privacy toolset.

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Check out RequestPolicy sometime if you're concerned about GA and other tracking and went through the trouble to bit bucket it in hosts; it's really nice to be able to set which other sites any given site can contact, and I trust it more than the other curated options like Ghostery etc. since I can see for myself where each site is allowed to go.

Unfortunately the Firefox 38 update broke RequestPolicy. There are other extensions that do a similar job, including a volunteer effort to continue the original extension, but right now none of them seems quite as neat and reliable as the original.

Is RP not being maintained then? :/ It's one of the tools that makes me actually like FireFox.

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#69
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this due to the Safe Browsing database? http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/02/28/the-google-cookie-tha... If so then it shouldn’t be present in current versions. Did you accidentally import cookies from another browser? Probably worth filing a bug if not.

> it shouldn’t be present in current versions This is what I see at launch[1]: http://clients1.google.com/ocsp https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/download?... [1] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/585534/7666597/5f...

The safe browsing cookie is in its own networking sandbox.

https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/base/...

https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/compo...

https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/compo...

Re: Mozilla's page talking about privacy has Google analytics enabled

#70

Next time you go to a movie theatre and there's someone standing there keeping count of how many people are going in - because it's there job or something - make sure to complain they're infringing on your right to privacy.

That same person is also standing at the entrance of almost every other building. To make his job easier he's also given you a unique identifier, so that he can notice when you enter a building he watches. I'm sure you've never noticed him, most people don't.

He handed you a unique identifier. You're the one who is keeping it safe and showing it to him every time you see him. Unless you manage your cookies a bit better.
Post reply on HN