Live data from Hacker News

8^8 – Find another you

8x8x8x8x8x8x8x8.com

131–140 of 166 posts

Re: 8^8 – Find another you

#131
post #71
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you see this post and thread, asking HN to avoid gratuitous negativity? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9317916

I'm not sure why my comment seems negative to you, while the comment above doesn't. The person above was generalizing negatively about "the people here", and it seemed gratuitous because no-one had criticized the speed or the CAPTCHA before. In other words, please hellban me now, because I didn't get what was negative in my first comment.

I'm not sure why you think I am critcising you. Parent post is talking about gratuitous negativity, and I wanted to make sure you understood what they meant by gratuitous negativity which, in the context of HN, has a specific meaning.

I don't have any power to hellban you!

Re: 8^8 – Find another you

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you for putting into clear words my gut impression that this wouldn't produce the intended result. I wonder if you couldn't do better with binary questions. I'm reminded of the site http://www.correlated.org/ . Suppose you were to ask a bunch of binary questions, and then use some statistics to find questions that have fairly evenly distributed and non-correlated results, then take 24 of the best questions by t…

okcupid does exactly this. Most of their questions are submitted by the users themselves, and they have hundreds if not thousands of them, but they present the questions to you in the order of most differentiating first. You can answer as many or as few as you want, but matches get better as you answer more, with monotonically diminishing returns. You also get to say which answers you would accept from your match (do…

It's like a Gram-Schmidt process. You take one question, then you look at other questions given (quotiented by, projected on, etc) that question, and so on.

Re: 8^8 – Find another you

#134
Lol, fail - I don't understand the question:

#2 "REMOVING WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING WOULD MAKE YOU A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PERSON?"

I'm not a native speaker -- what am I supposed to do here?

Re: 8^8 – Find another you

#135
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> On the other hand, I would feel a bit bad for using up some of the "freebies" that legitimate people might miss out on I wonder what the legality of publishing their questions and answers are. If we can duplicate their questions and answers, people could find each other on twitter with a hashtag: #my8x8is{answer 1}{answer 2}...{answer 2}

I like your idea about the hashtag. I don't think that the definitive answers are the best approach (I'd prefer multiple answers), but it'd interesting if we were able to design a "format" that could be used to describe one's answers.

but it'd interesting if we were able to design a "format" that could be used to describe one's answers

It's 24 bits, so how about six hex digits, like HTML colour codes?

Re: 8^8 – Find another you

#136
post #134

Lol, fail - I don't understand the question: #2 "REMOVING WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING WOULD MAKE YOU A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PERSON?" I'm not a native speaker -- what am I supposed to do here?

It might be rephrased into something like: "Which of these best define your personality?"

Re: 8^8 – Find another you

#139
post #97

Interesting idea. Bad execution. There is NO way that performance should be so bad given current load. Some of the questions are frustrating. For instance question #4 is "YOU SAVE AN OLD LADY'S LIFE. IN GRATITUDE SHE GIVES YOU $100,000. WHAT DO YOU DO WITH MOST OF IT?" The obvious answer for me is, "Save it." But all possible answers are ways to spend it or give it away. I chose "Move to a nicer neighborhood", but th…

I suspect at each POST request the website is attempting to match (and filter) against all existing results.

They state otherwise - "verification takes place a few days from now". And filtering against 20k results should be instant anyway.

Re: 8^8 – Find another you

#140
post #94

"Click on all of the icons below that represent animals." Anyone else notice that only the animals are simply-connected 2-manifolds? A bot could easily solve this.

You win the nitpick of the year award :-)

Actually there is a plane and a snowflake which share this property with the animals. But the set of images seems to be small - I got quite a few repetitions with just a few retries, so you could probably just hardcode it.

Which doesn't matter much - my feeling is that this test is rather intended to put humans into the right mood than to really deter bots.

Post reply on HN