This whole thing has been done before and in a way that allowed the questions to be crowdsourced, not just one person coming up with what he/she thinks are meaningful. On OKCupid, There are thousands of questions, many of them penned by users. You choose which questions to answer, then mark how important this question is to you. You also choose the answer you want your partner to have. For example: Are you looking fo…
8^8 – Find another you
101–110 of 166 posts
Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it were trying to match people based on their personalities and not their direct line of thinking - you would be correct. Until the results speak for themselves (ie. accuracy of matches) you have no way of knowing if this is a complete failure or successful venture. Although you are free to speculate that it will be meaningless due to the methodology, you have no evidence to back that up yet. Many dating sites wor…
I just did the math and at 12000 people and 16777216 possibilities, 98.63% chance there's at least 1 match. Not buyin' it!
It is quite possible that they have not tried to do the match online. Given their demonstrated competence, I wouldn't be surprise if it comes as a shock to them that they can simply put results in a flat file, sort, and then scan them for matches very quickly...
Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#103Interesting idea. Bad execution. There is NO way that performance should be so bad given current load. Some of the questions are frustrating. For instance question #4 is "YOU SAVE AN OLD LADY'S LIFE. IN GRATITUDE SHE GIVES YOU $100,000. WHAT DO YOU DO WITH MOST OF IT?" The obvious answer for me is, "Save it." But all possible answers are ways to spend it or give it away. I chose "Move to a nicer neighborhood", but th…
Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#104Yeah, the site is painfully slow. A site with a multiple choice test should handle thousands of users at a time with a tiny server. How is this thing made?
Seriously. I mean maybe not 1000 request/sec but at least 50/sec, which will get you pretty far (3k/ppl/min). And they at the bottom say 11k matches so far... too bad I like the premise!
Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously. I mean maybe not 1000 request/sec but at least 50/sec, which will get you pretty far (3k/ppl/min). And they at the bottom say 11k matches so far... too bad I like the premise!
I think the number you saw was the number of tests taken so far; there are 0 matches, currently.
Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#106Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#107Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#108The basic claim is false on many levels: Very few of us are lucky enough to come across our soulmate within our lifetimes. We tend to choose our friends and spouses from the limited pool of people available in our immediate vicinity: students at our schools, people who live in our neighborhoods, colleagues at our workplaces. Statistically, it is extremely unlikely that we will come across our soulmate. First off, the…
Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#109It's fascinating (not being snarky) that this post has received about 50+ votes since I first saw it, and I've not once been able to pull the site up completely (never made it past the bot detection, and most of the time, won't even come up). So I'm trying to understand the phenomenon: - HN folks are bookmarking it for later based on comments (even though it may/may not be worthy of a +1) - HN folks are +1'ing it bas…
Re: 8^8 – Find another you
#110"Take the 8^8 test and the likelihood of someone else answering in the exact same pattern as yourself is 1 in 16,777,216" That requires A) the distribution of answers is even across all 8 options, and B) there are zero correlations between any two answers in the quiz. Not to mention that the 8 questions have to pretty accurately split the space of human personalities down into eigen-answers that explain the most vari…
Thank you for putting into clear words my gut impression that this wouldn't produce the intended result. I wonder if you couldn't do better with binary questions. I'm reminded of the site http://www.correlated.org/ . Suppose you were to ask a bunch of binary questions, and then use some statistics to find questions that have fairly evenly distributed and non-correlated results, then take 24 of the best questions by t…
My gut tells me it's akin to doing principle component analysis. To find the most differentiating question, do 1 dimensional PCA, and the question most aligned with the resulting dimension is question #1. Then do 2 dimensional PCA fixing the first dimension as the first question. The result is question #2. And so on.
OF FAR GREATER CONCERN: They are collecting email addresses associated with personality questions. There is no privacy policy, other than the statement "If there's a match, we'll email you. (You will not be emailed under any other circumstances: no promos, no newsletters, nothing except news of a match.)" You don't know to whom you are giving this information, as there is no named legal entity, just a gmail address and a domain name whose registered owner is hidden in whois databases.