This seems rather pointless given HTLM5 ServiceWorkers. All of the benefits they're claiming with respect to local prefetching content for offline, instant use can be done with that spec. Even push-message content updates when the mobile browser isn't even running can be achieved. The only missing component is IOS support which might be possible to polyfill in via a hybrid. I'm pretty sure Facebook knows about this,…
Absolutely nobody is avoiding reading articles because they take too long to load but they have to have some sort of positive way of describing it.
Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
41–50 of 57 posts
Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#42Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#43This seems rather pointless given HTLM5 ServiceWorkers. All of the benefits they're claiming with respect to local prefetching content for offline, instant use can be done with that spec. Even push-message content updates when the mobile browser isn't even running can be achieved. The only missing component is IOS support which might be possible to polyfill in via a hybrid. I'm pretty sure Facebook knows about this,…
Absolutely nobody is avoiding reading articles because they take too long to load but they have to have some sort of positive way of describing it.
Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Imagine if they sent their articles to the supermarket and the supermarket decided how to lay it out and what ads to run. And perhaps also interspersed your articles with articles from other sources you did not vet ahead of time.
How is this different than what is happening today?
Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#45Facebook is not my desired source of news. The use case I had for Facebook is based upon it's original premise. Connecting with Friends, seeing what they are up to, where they are and sharing photos. They are littering their platform with features that further dilutes the experience that everyone used to like/love. I despise seeing Buzzfeed and clickbait titles on the site. This is not the content I want to consume h…
Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely nobody is avoiding reading articles because they take too long to load but they have to have some sort of positive way of describing it.
What? In my experience this has always been true on mobile. If something takes longer than a few seconds to load it gets closed or restarted.
Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#47Facebook is not my desired source of news. The use case I had for Facebook is based upon it's original premise. Connecting with Friends, seeing what they are up to, where they are and sharing photos. They are littering their platform with features that further dilutes the experience that everyone used to like/love. I despise seeing Buzzfeed and clickbait titles on the site. This is not the content I want to consume h…
Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely nobody is avoiding reading articles because they take too long to load but they have to have some sort of positive way of describing it.
Some people may be on mobile devices, but obviously it isn't the articles that is taking to long to load. It is the layers and layers of blocking JavaScript used for tracking and serving up ads that are taking forever to load.
Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#49Re: Facebook Starts Hosting “Instant Articles”
#50A bit ironic: instantarticles.fb.com is a CNAME to fbinstantarticles.wordpress.com.