Twitter, but without code
31–40 of 68 posts
Re: Twitter, but without code
#32Don't post on HN of all places and claim we don't need programmers... On a serious note, cool product but we've seen many many many of these sorts of platforms before. They never work outside a niche market simply because programming isn't about typing, but assembling logic.
Re: Twitter, but without code
#33This may very well be a cool product - I like the idea of people being able to build things without code (how do they architect a DB?). Of course, as a lot of people are pointing out, this approach doesn't scale very well. To be fair, neither did the original Twitter, and it was built on Rails. They're different levels of scale, but if all you really need is a proof of concept this could solve the "How do I find a CT…
I totally agree with you, the website is really slow, most likely because it ended here...
Being optimistic, it might just be a hosting problem.
Re: Twitter, but without code
#34Re: Twitter, but without code
#35Re: Twitter, but without code
#36If any of the site's devs are browsing the comments, you might want to address this problem I found while navigating the site: http://imgur.com/h0iUIVw
Re: Twitter, but without code
#37Maybe this could be a good thing in the future for simple prototyping (to show off to investors, not a general public kind of thing) but the bubble.is pricing advertises "Grow" "Scale" and "Flourish" plans for $460, $1700, and $4200 respectively.[1] I would definitely wait until the architecture here becomes more advanced before trusting them with your entire app.
I noticed their architecture was built on JS. JS is a pain in the butt when it comes to sandboxing. Either you run multiple contexts in a V8 engine that can crash each other if one OOMs, or you start up a new process for every instance. Single-threadedness is also not fun to deal with, in terms of efficiency.
(Yes, I've explored building a service like this on Node.js. I summarily discovered that it's probably not the best plan.)
Re: Twitter, but without code
#38Re: Twitter, but without code
#39Re: Twitter, but without code
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
I totally agree with you, the website is really slow, most likely because it ended here...
If the resulting sites can't handle a traffic spike, it's not that great a tool, is it? No one wants a hammer that shatters if you swing it too hard... Being optimistic, it might just be a hosting problem.