Live data from Hacker News

Twitter, but without code

notrealtwitter.com

11–20 of 68 posts

Re: Twitter, but without code

#11

> if we ever for some reason have to close down shop, we will release the Bubble source code under an open-source license so that you can set up your own Bubble server and keep your app running That's quite a nice thing to read. I hope more people start committing to this.

We're already working on a distribution version and we'll open an API soon so that people can add things that are missing.

Re: Twitter, but without code

#12

The level of detail in this makes me doubt the claim (0 lines of code), but assuming it is true: really well done. For those who are wondering if its just a login page: you can register an account (login is automatic on registration, and email verification is not required). The entire UI is almost exactly same as twitter. Link to the framework used: https://bubble.is/

I really like the idea of these 0 lines of code websites, but mostly for more static sites. As you can tell with this site, it's already suffering from lag in a bunch of places, which might be hard to fix. Disclaimer: I have never used bubble.is, but similar products

Re: Twitter, but without code

#13
So, it lets you prototype apps. That is awesome.

Too bad all those engineers are going to be farmers by 2020 though. Because when your prototype gets popular, I doubt Bubble.is can handle all the things that actually make your app run at scale (the deployments, maintenance, database, etc management programming that is really what makes apps like Twitter run .. not just the tiny html/css/js stack that the client plays with).

Re: Twitter, but without code

#14
It's Visual Basic for the web then?

EDIT: To clarify that, I don't mean that in a nasty, snarky way. VB drove a lot of business software and got huge numbers of people writing software, many of whom weren't employed as developers.

Re: Twitter, but without code

#15
post #14

It's Visual Basic for the web then? EDIT: To clarify that, I don't mean that in a nasty, snarky way. VB drove a lot of business software and got huge numbers of people writing software, many of whom weren't employed as developers.

Exactly, but entirely visual, no Basic

Re: Twitter, but without code

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lot of people are signing up though. Doens't work for you?

Ah, you should specify that you need to make an account. For some reason I was thinking this might somehow attempt to do SSO and grab your actual twitter data

Lemme just give my actual Twitter login details to some guy I've never heard of.

Re: Twitter, but without code

#18
post #13

So, it lets you prototype apps. That is awesome. Too bad all those engineers are going to be farmers by 2020 though. Because when your prototype gets popular, I doubt Bubble.is can handle all the things that actually make your app run at scale (the deployments, maintenance, database, etc management programming that is really what makes apps like Twitter run .. not just the tiny html/css/js stack that the client plays…

It seems like it might be useful for the same kinds of scenarios something like Access is -- basically, end users making small internal tools.

Re: Twitter, but without code

#19
It reminds me of all those people saying wysiwyg editors would kill the need to know HTML. Really, they made it possible for developers to work on more complicated and exciting projects. Uncle Phil wants help with his flower store website? He'll be happy with WordPress.com or SquareSpace.com and you can continue working on your stuff without being a bad nephew.

Re: Twitter, but without code

#20
This may very well be a cool product - I like the idea of people being able to build things without code (how do they architect a DB?).

Of course, as a lot of people are pointing out, this approach doesn't scale very well. To be fair, neither did the original Twitter, and it was built on Rails. They're different levels of scale, but if all you really need is a proof of concept this could solve the "How do I find a CTO so we can build a quick app and see if anyone cares?" problem.

I'd be careful pitching it (yet) as a "we'll never need engineers again" product, as I don't think that's the case; it is incredibly slow, and it errored out for me three times (http://take.ms/iwa9W). I still haven't been able to get in.

Post reply on HN