Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#12A magnitude 7.8 earthquake is 2.511 times bigger than a magnitude 7.4 earthquake on a seismogram, but is 3.981 times stronger (energy release). via http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/calculator.php
I did not quite understand "3.981 times stronger (energy release)", but god bless everyone.
I didn't run the numbers, but it seems plausible the difference would be that big.
According to Wikipedia[1] a 7.5 quake releases 11 petajoules of energy, while a 7.8 quake release 32 petajoules.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale#Example...
Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#13A magnitude 7.8 earthquake is 2.511 times bigger than a magnitude 7.4 earthquake on a seismogram, but is 3.981 times stronger (energy release). via http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/calculator.php
I did not quite understand "3.981 times stronger (energy release)", but god bless everyone.
Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#14[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2015_Nepal_earthquake
Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
I did not quite understand "3.981 times stronger (energy release)", but god bless everyone.
The Richter scale is exponential. According to chrisra a 7.8 earthquake release almost 4x the energy of a 7.4 quake. I didn't run the numbers, but it seems plausible the difference would be that big. According to Wikipedia[1] a 7.5 quake releases 11 petajoules of energy, while a 7.8 quake release 32 petajoules. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale#Example...
Edit: The difference between a 8.6 one and a 8.7 one is huge. The difference is as big as the difference between 0.0 and 8.35, in megatons at least.
Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#16Please help the OSM HOT [1] team to map the regions struck by the earthquake. Without proper/up-to-date maps, coordinating emergency efforts is hardly possible. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2015_Nepal_earthquake
Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#17Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#18A magnitude 7.8 earthquake is 2.511 times bigger than a magnitude 7.4 earthquake on a seismogram, but is 3.981 times stronger (energy release). via http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/calculator.php
Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Richter scale is exponential. According to chrisra a 7.8 earthquake release almost 4x the energy of a 7.4 quake. I didn't run the numbers, but it seems plausible the difference would be that big. According to Wikipedia[1] a 7.5 quake releases 11 petajoules of energy, while a 7.8 quake release 32 petajoules. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale#Example...
This is something that's always bothered me. The Richter scale is not, for normal people like myself, a good earthquake magnitude indicator. I always have trouble grasping that 7.5 and 7.8 are so far apart in terms of severity since my mind is set to find a .3 difference negligible. I would like to have a metric measurement of earthquakes that would allow me to more quickly understand the scale and size of a quake. E…
Magnitude of Earthquake M = log I / S
(where I is the intensity of the earthquake taken 100km from epicenter, S is the intensity of a standard earthquake)
First earthquake 7.8 = log I1 / S
Second earthquake 7.1 = log I2 / S
If we solve this for I1/I2, we get 10 ^ 1.10 ~ 12.5
> The intensity of first earthquake was 12.5 times as intense as the later earthquake.
Re: Nepal earthquake, magnitude 7.3, strikes near Everest
#20Aftershocks felt, there were at least 2. I ll call them major ones. I was sitting on 4th floor. It felt very strong.