Earlier quoted context omitted.
Translated: "That same energy could have been spent on something I care about and not what the author cares about." Which kind of explains why communism always leads to tyranny: it is based on the essentially tyrannical assumption that communists alone have the knowledge to decide how everyone else should be spending thier time, and the moral authority to impose that judgement on others by force. The problem is that…
Just curious, but does communism by necessity or definition require central planning? Is a distributed power model not possible, aside from the fact that it hasn't been done? I'm genuinely curious, as I've never studied political systems in any depth.
Kibbutzes and communes generally are communist but work without central planning