Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Don't forget, Sourceforge was the Github of yesteryear. Not really. At that time, there were almost no alternatives. Sourceforge was slow and bloated, even without ads. Nobody wanted to use it, but at least it was free (in the sense of free beer). And it took them ages to support SVN in addition to CVS. When they finally supported it, many project were already thinking about switching from SVN to a distributed VCS.
> Not really. How do you figure? It was "the way" to share your OSS project in its time. It wasn't great, but it was the best we had.
Nobody questions that.
But that doesn't quality for "the GitHub of that time", because most people like to use GitHub, so the analogy is incomplete in some essential aspects.