Live data from Hacker News

GitHub's down?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 154 posts

Re: GitHub's down?

#51
post #28
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not just for a company, but for developer productivity in general, professional or not... Think of all the package managers that pull straight from Github repos as part of their installation processes..

Exactly ... we've got Ansible scripts that do that. One of the current Java rockstars (not my description), Adam Bien, recommends pulling the source code for all third-party dependencies to build them locally and put them in a local repository. I suppose you can push directly back upstream to avoid having an extra step.

If you're using Java most of the build tools use the Maven repositories, for which you can set up a local mirror too. The company i work for runs a Sonatype Nexus so we're not really affected by others' downtime unless we need stuff that we hadn't ever used before.

Re: GitHub's down?

#52
Probably people trying to clone curvytron because curvytron isn't currently playable at its own site.

It's like an unintentional pub crawl-- 400 people show up to party, empty the pub of booze, move on to the next pub that hasn't enough booze...

Re: GitHub's down?

#54
Hopefully the responding on-call engineers aren't tired folks but folks in other timezones. The reason that the risk of compounding the situation is lessened, because trying to fix important shit when tired is like driving without a seatbelt.

Update: seems to be back, so it doesn't matter unless someone's having an early morning.

Re: GitHub's down?

#55
post #35
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just noticed an interesting design decision on that page. An 'everything OK' message once a day. One way to push previous downtime below the fold of the page.

It's also a way to show "yes, this status check is still reliably doing its job, it hasn't crashed".

OK I could take that as a reason.

Re: GitHub's down?

#57
post #44

For everyone who is currently loosing productivity, perhaps your time might be well spent reviewing `git daemon`: http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-on-the-Server-Git-Daemon

OK I get what you're saying, but honestly, who is really 'losing productivity'? I suspect the ones saying they are in fact just getting on with other tasks they can do because they are, despite github, still using distributed version control and do have access to and the ability to commit to code repositories. You don't need to host your own git daemon or github clone to get that functionality. I don't use github bec…

It kinda sucks when you rely on continuous integration, though.
Post reply on HN