Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 51 posts

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#21
First off, it's probably not lack of respect. If you really think that and you can't get it out of your head, then don't join the company. To me, that seems like a market salary. For better or worse, experience doesn't count for that much in the market for software engineers.

You could probably trade some salary for equity. It's all about your personal situation and how much cash you need. For me, 130k would be a bit overkill and at this point I'd try to trade 30k for an extra half point or so (I'm betting they'd cap the equity at .5% total or something though).

That said, if they're hiring a 20th employee at 130k and you're confident that there's enough money in the bank + revenue that doing so makes sense (that's something to check), then the risk factor is a lot lower than a 4 person startup burning through seed capital who will offer you the 1-2% you're after. There are a lot of those in SF that you can join. You probably won't have a nice office or free meals but you'll make a bigger dent at a smaller scale and therefore get a bigger piece of a smaller pie.

In short, from the info you gave, I don't think they're necessarily low-balling you. But if you do, don't join. If you're good, there are at least 50 other companies in the bay who will give you an offer like that tomorrow.

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#22

Also, I'd be leaving a job I really don't like at a Silicon Valley spinoff. $150K salary, 0.75% equity, shiny CEO with regular Fox-Business-News appearances, rising company notoriety, selling into a hot market. The company will never raise more "venture" funding, the parent will structure future injections as debt (at a reasonable interest rate, likely, but probably less onerous than VC). This current company has a h…

Are you able to get the payout for that equity if you leave that job? That is, are you vested and can you exercise the options without significant pain?

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#23
post #2

Been there done that. The answer is: No! Think of a start-up founder like a con-man trying to sell you snake oil.

Thing is, three previous startups turned out not-so-bad (net positive) for me. Not home runs, but they made a material difference. I also like the small-company environment and challenges -- but perhaps that's only because I have worked only in startups. I look at "HN Who's Hiring" posts by outfits like Walmart Labs and wonder what the difference would be.

Your grievances about your current company:

> This current company has a highly dysfunctional development culture, no automated testing, poor choice of deployment vehicle, a VP high on the DK spectrum.

That sounds EXACTLY like Silicon Valley Generic BigCo to me.

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#24
post #6

Two key considerations: - Does the company (and it's investors/accelerators) have some sort of prestige that many people outside of the company would recognize? (i.e. if you put it on your resume will it look good later) - Ignore equity at this point (as the chances of it really paying off massive dividends are unrealistically low). Is $130k range in line with what you expect to earn? (note - $130k is comfortably liv…

> (note - $130k is comfortably livable in pretty much anywhere in the SF Bay area) That depends on a ton of things.

Care to elaborate?

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#25
post #18

I've never worked at an early-stage company, so I have more questions than answers. Isn't 0.2% basically nothing? Even if GoogleSoftBook buys the company right now for $100M, you get (at best) $200k. And that's not going to happen. Probably more money will be raised, your 0.2% will be diluted, and a $100M exit is rare. So you'll end up with less than 1yr of salary for all that risk and lost salary/benefits in the mea…

I was employee #10 at Palantir and received and accepted an offer in this ballpark. I'm pretty happy with it at this point. Frankly it was absolutely life changing, both from a learning perspective and a compensation perspective. Of course that's an outlier — but this is why you should treat what company you join the way investors think about investments. Only they get to diversify and your choice is even more important — you only get one shot at any given point.

rgbrgb's point is also well taken. You should be able to swap equity for salary, since for a pre Series A company that's a chunk of coin.

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#26
It doesn't sound like it's your dream job. It might or might not be good enough for now.

I wouldn't take the low equity offer personally, at 8 engineers, you're not their first hire, and the position is more or less "need another engineer" at this point. On the other hand, it does mean that hiring you in particular is not the priority.

It's ok to be ok with that and its implications for the way your role will be perceived in the workplace over the short term. It's ok not to be ok with that. Working remotely may or may not be worth it.

In the end, I suspect that top pay and wow! equity aren't going to attach themselves to many advertised remote positions. It's when remote work is how a company gets the specific individual they want that those are more likely.

Good luck.

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#27
It's probably inexperience. I'd try and talk them up a bit.

But other commenters are right: pay attention to the salary, the benefits and the position itself. The equity is a lottery ticket. I do believe they should correct the amount to make you feel valued, but that's the only reason.

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#28
I'd ask for either more money or more equity. Don't short change yourself. If your overall goals are just looking for more experience then go for it if you think it would be fun.

Corporations assert their power all the time. There is nothing wrong with you asserting your worth. Good luck!

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#29

Also, I'd be leaving a job I really don't like at a Silicon Valley spinoff. $150K salary, 0.75% equity, shiny CEO with regular Fox-Business-News appearances, rising company notoriety, selling into a hot market. The company will never raise more "venture" funding, the parent will structure future injections as debt (at a reasonable interest rate, likely, but probably less onerous than VC). This current company has a h…

Are you there for the money or for the love? If money, stay and suck it up. If work represents a large portion of your happiness, bail. 2 years is not really a long time to live in suck-it-up mode, although your perspective will depend on which side of 30 you're on.

On the way-later side of 30!

The current company is legacy-land as far as development tools goes (though they're reliable and in the right hands do very well). The prospective startup would involve new tools I need to "keep up-to-date".

I did a short (paid) project for them involving some popular scripting significantly-hipper-than-Perl language and delivered it in serviceable, idiomatic form that I know they were very happy with, using all the right libraries. I picked it up the tool/language quickly enough. I feel I need that experience and exposure to maintain my longevity in the SW market. Sticking with the current company is 2 more years I become more of a dinosaur.

Re: Ask HN: Should I join startup for less-than-expected equity?

#30
That is low, but that's a big headcount for pre-A-- did they raise a huge seed?

That aside, you earn equity with risk, so my question to you would be: "What are you risking?" Certainly there's an opportunity cost (you're risking not working somewhere else). If you think your work-remotely-market-rate for a non-startup (i.e. no stock) is X, then you are risking X - 130k per year for 0.2%/4 (vesting over four years). So if X is $150k, you're buying those shares for $80k (4 years of salary difference). Is that a good bet in your eyes? It'd only be a good bet in mine if I had fairly heroic belief in the startups shot at "unicorn" status or if I was really excited about the work/team.

However, if you think $130k is a reasonable salary for remote work and the contribution you'll be making (it could well be), then the stock is a high-risk bonus.

Regardless, you should certainly negotiate for more salary OR equity (whichever you care about more) every time.

Post reply on HN