Live data from Hacker News

Xkcd - story of our lives

xkcd.com

1–10 of 34 posts

Re: Xkcd - story of our lives

#7
post #2

In case anyone doesn't recognize it, the hexadecimal value in the title text is the "magic" number used in the famous approximate inverse square root routine.

attributed to John Carmack and first observed (by non-id people) in the source of Quake III

here's a good read http://www.codemaestro.com/reviews/9

[Edit: I've always thought this was Carmack's code, but it looks like I was wrong. see email from Carmack in here http://www.beyond3d.com/content/articles/8/ ]

Re: Xkcd - story of our lives

#9
My experience with working in academia was that I created some software with big ideas, almost laughably poor quality of implementation, and which (mostly) ended up filed away with a grant application which has been forgotten by probably eight of the ten people who know it exists.

My experience with creating software in the Real World has been that I do mostly boring things with periodic flashes of insight, that in a period of five years I went from being useless grunt labor to actually making meaningful decisions (almost enough time to be allowed to tie your own shoes in academia without a PhD supervising you, as long as you give all the credit for the shoe-tying to the PhD who isn't supervising you), and I can point to actual people whose lives are measurably better for me having done the work.

(Among them myself, since I no longer make $12 an hour. Not that us Japanese salarymen are rolling in it, but it is a pleasant change to not worry about how I am getting home for Christmas.)

Sadly, my ability to express this comment in the form of a witty stick figure sketch leaves much to be desired.

Re: Xkcd - story of our lives

#10
In my opinion, both outcomes are sad and unfortunate. Who has benefited from the engineer's genius? Well, a bunch of journal articles got written and perhaps someone wrote a dissertation or five, alternatively a few thousands of dollars got written off the bottom line of some mega-corp.

That's when the entrepreneur steps in. Either the dinky program fix, or the obscure (or not so much) journal article can be turned into something that is brought out to people, for the entrepreneur's profit, which is wholly contingent on convincing people that they have benefited!

It's sad to me that there really are large quantities of brilliant people who could be the guy in the first two panels who truly think the two outcomes on the right are the only possibilities.

Post reply on HN