Live data from Hacker News

Peter Thiel on what works at work (2014)

washingtonpost.com

31–40 of 98 posts

Re: Peter Thiel on what works at work (2014)

#31

Instead of living everyday as if it was your last or as if it was going to go forever, how about living everyday as if you're going to die at around 80-85?

It really depends for people. You can keep track of all your thoughts and ideas meticulously, to ensure that none of them are a quantitative exaggeration or minimization of a linguistic translation of your present perceptions of the objective state of 'things'. But if you do that long enough, it is very hard to have an imagination, and you also can easily squash desire and fear this way as well. Dreams may also come out weird, and mathematical, logical, and computational terminology may seem to express multiple meanings about your conscious awareness (implicit metaphor - because logic + truth = ?, which gets very weird when you describe emotions or familial/friendly relations).

You can live assuming everything everyone tells you is correct, and you can assume this collectively forms your information sphere and consequently, your image of the world, and even then project that image onto something you call 'reality'. But it's a bubble. People change those bubbles because even though everything in reality tells them that they can not change the bubble, they know that it's still a bubble that you have to be convinced into in the first place.

The map is not the territory. -Alfred Korzybski

Re: Peter Thiel on what works at work (2014)

#32
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And plenty of devs go and work for such companies and individuals… One would think we'd come up with better ways by now to lessen the allocation of resources for things in the present that are of marginal utility for most people, but somehow, humans have a knack of creating/engaging red queens races relative to other things that are theoretically possible and feasible.

Becomes hard to turn down a compensation that could be 1.5-2x larger than others.

Most start ups (and large co's) are offering devs to work on pretty much the same thing, which in my opinion is very easy to turn down and actively avoid… 1.5x, 2x (at best for most) to ship marginally interesting projects that will probably provide not much more than marginal utility for most people while being around people who will pretend (or believe) otherwise… yeah…

Re: Peter Thiel on what works at work (2014)

#33

Something I found very interesting was Peter's comment: "You try to hire people you could become friends with." I contrast this with Zuckerberg's approach to only hiring people that he would work for ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2015/03... ). It's probably not fair to put these side-by-side due to context, but Peter's approach resonates with me now. Here's how I reconcile this: Peter's "frie…

"Try to hire people you could become friends with" seems like a really bad idea from the discrimination point of view, since people are most likely to view someone of the same race, age, and gender as a potential friend.

Re: Peter Thiel on what works at work (2014)

#34

Something I found very interesting was Peter's comment: "You try to hire people you could become friends with." I contrast this with Zuckerberg's approach to only hiring people that he would work for ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2015/03... ). It's probably not fair to put these side-by-side due to context, but Peter's approach resonates with me now. Here's how I reconcile this: Peter's "frie…

> Mark's approach (for me) makes great sense on paper, but Peter's approach comes with the value of been-there-done-that.

Keep in mind that Mark only briefly "worked for" anybody in high school and college, and most of these were contracting positions.

In a way, the only example of people he wouldn't "work for" that we know about is the Winklevosses after he decided to "stop working" on "their idea"

Re: Peter Thiel on what works at work (2014)

#35
post #33

Something I found very interesting was Peter's comment: "You try to hire people you could become friends with." I contrast this with Zuckerberg's approach to only hiring people that he would work for ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2015/03... ). It's probably not fair to put these side-by-side due to context, but Peter's approach resonates with me now. Here's how I reconcile this: Peter's "frie…

"Try to hire people you could become friends with" seems like a really bad idea from the discrimination point of view, since people are most likely to view someone of the same race, age, and gender as a potential friend.

[deleted]

Re: Peter Thiel on what works at work (2014)

#36
post #33

Something I found very interesting was Peter's comment: "You try to hire people you could become friends with." I contrast this with Zuckerberg's approach to only hiring people that he would work for ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2015/03... ). It's probably not fair to put these side-by-side due to context, but Peter's approach resonates with me now. Here's how I reconcile this: Peter's "frie…

"Try to hire people you could become friends with" seems like a really bad idea from the discrimination point of view, since people are most likely to view someone of the same race, age, and gender as a potential friend.

Regardless of gender or ethnicity, if everyone you hire is a 20-something graduate of the same top-10 CS programmes what you get is... Google+ (or Wave or Buzz...)

Diversity means you don't get trapped in an echo chamber.

Re: Peter Thiel on what works at work (2014)

#40
post #33

Something I found very interesting was Peter's comment: "You try to hire people you could become friends with." I contrast this with Zuckerberg's approach to only hiring people that he would work for ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2015/03... ). It's probably not fair to put these side-by-side due to context, but Peter's approach resonates with me now. Here's how I reconcile this: Peter's "frie…

"Try to hire people you could become friends with" seems like a really bad idea from the discrimination point of view, since people are most likely to view someone of the same race, age, and gender as a potential friend.

"You try to hire people you could become friends with" is a profoundly stupid maxim.

People who come from conservative and religious societies will always be pressured by friends to not make new friends who are of different ethnicities.

Thiel is basically ensuring each company Will become a little Island of segregation and this is what I have seen in the bay area: companies that are 90% Indian, 90% Chinese, or 90% white guys.

Post reply on HN