Based on Amazon's choice of clipart images (bulk janitorial supplies) and verbage (lab beakers, break room snacks) they chose to highlight this launch, it looks like AmazonBusiness is competing with companies like Global Industrial[1], ULINE[2], etc more so than Office Depot and Staples. Most of the items (paper, pens, etc) people bought from Office Depot, they could get already get from the normal amazon.com/office.…
Unrelated, but have you looked at the high end (+$100) AmazonBasic items? Monitor swing arms, paper shredders, a fire pit, and a gas-powered patio heater. Tripods get an honorable mention at $80. I'm not sure who these are being sold to, and why under the Basics label.
Amazon Business
21–30 of 57 posts
Re: Amazon Business
#22Re: Amazon Business
#23Everyone is going to focus on the discounts thing, but I think this is the real USP (over a standard account): > Create a single or multi-user business account, approve orders I've been in a lot of companies where they want to offload buying (e.g. office supplies, computer equipment) but don't have a dedicated department to oversee it, and don't really want to be handing out the company credit card to every employee…
A multi-user business account is even bigger when you consider this is more than just the sale of physical products. It's also computing services via AWS, hiring remote workers via Mech Turk, and books+apps+other virtual goods via Kindle/App marketplace. Amazon just launched local services too, so this could let an authorised employee hire contractors under a managed, audited, workflow. (I don't know if all of those…
Re: Amazon Business
#24A business is the perfect use case for the 1-click buy button Amazon introduced a few weeks ago, Amazon Dash.
Re: Amazon Business
#25Wow. Images for the text on landing page? Seriously, Amazon?
And a table-based layout, and the navigation is a single image with maps. Pretty incredible to see in production on Amazon in 2015.
Re: Amazon Business
#26Edit: Found FAQ on that - If you have this in addition to prime, there's no order threshold. http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=b2b_...
Re: Amazon Business
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unrelated, but have you looked at the high end (+$100) AmazonBasic items? Monitor swing arms, paper shredders, a fire pit, and a gas-powered patio heater. Tripods get an honorable mention at $80. I'm not sure who these are being sold to, and why under the Basics label.
What's so unclear here? This is the store brand, and it is often times nicer than competition at the price. I have an AB branded camera bag, and it's great. I have also bought cables, and other small accessories from them and they have been of good quality. If I need a monitor arm and can get one for $100 from Amazon or $140 from another manufacturer I wouldn't think twice and just get the AB one.
How many copper fire pits do you think the average person buys per year?
Re: Amazon Business
#28Unconstructive nitpick: the text quality in the images on that page is awful. Very aliased, and the letters seem kind of randomly sized and kerned. It's quite strange.
http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/img15/amazon-busi...
It has always seemed freaky to me that Amazon still uses images for paragraphs of text. I have assumed it is because the real-world web is more broken than I know.
Re: Amazon Business
#29Unconstructive nitpick: the text quality in the images on that page is awful. Very aliased, and the letters seem kind of randomly sized and kerned. It's quite strange.
I have nothing against big A, they often use this strategy to try a bunch of stuff out and see if it works, almost always at a loss, and see how they can make money off of it.
Anyone who has looked into Glacier (for instance) will see that Amazon probably didnt buy a bunch of crazy robots, but is more likely selling EC2 at a loss to see if anyone thinks this is a good idea, and then some sort of plan backing it when they see enough volume to care.
Re: Amazon Business
#30Unconstructive nitpick: the text quality in the images on that page is awful. Very aliased, and the letters seem kind of randomly sized and kerned. It's quite strange.
I noticed this as well. It's because they're rendering text in jpegs which is not a great idea for legibility... Strange choice from such a large technology company.