Unreal. Do they really expect it to cost more to maintain their web presence in addition to their mobile app than their web presence will make them? If you already have a back-end for servicing all of those mobile apps, is having an HTML front-end really that difficult? I vastly prefer doing almost anything I can think of on a real desktop with big displays and a good keyboard over a mobile app. Am I that out of touc…
India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
61–70 of 76 posts
Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's already past time that Android had (out-of-the-box) a "don't grant access but make the application think I did"-checkbox. Essentially, showing fake data to the app if you pick this (eg: no photos, fake contacts, etc). AFAIK, there are some android apps (and cyanogen) that add this features, but it really needs to be worked on upstream. This is doubly useful for google, since they can always keep their own apps a…
It'll be better if there are checkboxes next to each permission, and if the user doesn't grant a certain permission, the app can know . Older apps targeting older API levels will receive fake data, whereas newer apps will be able to know whether they were actually granted the permission or not. This would prevent apps (and app developers) from being left in the dark, and would also kill the "all or nothing" permissio…
Nah.
Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#63They bought myntra because of tough competition and have to close it anyway. They are doing an experiment by keeping the mobile version.
Slow death for Myntra! PR for Flipkart mobile app!
Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's already past time that Android had (out-of-the-box) a "don't grant access but make the application think I did"-checkbox. Essentially, showing fake data to the app if you pick this (eg: no photos, fake contacts, etc). AFAIK, there are some android apps (and cyanogen) that add this features, but it really needs to be worked on upstream. This is doubly useful for google, since they can always keep their own apps a…
It'll be better if there are checkboxes next to each permission, and if the user doesn't grant a certain permission, the app can know . Older apps targeting older API levels will receive fake data, whereas newer apps will be able to know whether they were actually granted the permission or not. This would prevent apps (and app developers) from being left in the dark, and would also kill the "all or nothing" permissio…
Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
One reason I haven't seen mentioned yet is that countries like India can be overwhelmingly mobile-dominated (as in, few people own desktops). I never had data on India but in places like the Philippines or Indonesia (with similar GDP/capita), your buyer's only internet access might come from his (very basic) smartphone and I sometimes saw > 90% mobile visits. At a previous company, we saw our Indonesian traffic soar…
The issue here is that Flipkart is not poor. It is one of the largest private companies in India, with valuations at $11 billion. They have already spun off their costlier operations (such as courier and warehousing) into separate companies which they have since sold off. The only thing flipkart is doing right now is tech and sales. They are definitely not "limited" by money or IT resources.
Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#66Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#67Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#68I am an regular Flipkart User, and I do not like this behaviour, Flipkart is forcing me to move to an mobile app, just to have better control and tracking. They have already stopped supporting the mobile website, and it simply instructs you to download the app to continue. This is the moment I have completely stopped using flipkart and moved to amazon.in I like website more than app, both gets the job done, where as…
It's already past time that Android had (out-of-the-box) a "don't grant access but make the application think I did"-checkbox. Essentially, showing fake data to the app if you pick this (eg: no photos, fake contacts, etc). AFAIK, there are some android apps (and cyanogen) that add this features, but it really needs to be worked on upstream. This is doubly useful for google, since they can always keep their own apps a…
The weird thing is, it does. Or, rather, it's hidden-in-the-box. There's an app called App Ops that can be enabled if you have root access that limits permissions to installed apps - I'm actually not sure if it sends fake data instead but I'm yet to have an app crash from it. But without root it's not usable. Sigh.
Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
He means mobile service provider (airtel, vodafone, at&t, etc)
Oh, I thought he meant the App or the Play store.. Isnt that how in app purchases work?
Re: India’s Flipkart to shut down website, thanks to popularity of mobile
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
One reason I haven't seen mentioned yet is that countries like India can be overwhelmingly mobile-dominated (as in, few people own desktops). I never had data on India but in places like the Philippines or Indonesia (with similar GDP/capita), your buyer's only internet access might come from his (very basic) smartphone and I sometimes saw > 90% mobile visits. At a previous company, we saw our Indonesian traffic soar…
The issue here is that Flipkart is not poor. It is one of the largest private companies in India, with valuations at $11 billion. They have already spun off their costlier operations (such as courier and warehousing) into separate companies which they have since sold off. The only thing flipkart is doing right now is tech and sales. They are definitely not "limited" by money or IT resources.
These companies have in common that they hired "cheap and many" rather than "expensive and few" initially to lower their startup costs and "tech risk", and that they are run by former bankers and McKinseys who consider tech "below them", something that is "commoditized" and can just be "bought in".