Live data from Hacker News

Recycling in America

economist.com

61–70 of 77 posts

Re: Recycling in America

#61
Planet Money had the reverse side of this less than a month ago - a recycler barely making it by IIRC. http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2015/03/27/395815221/episode-...

This is also heavily influenced by oil prices - if oil is cheaper then plastics made from it are cheaper but the collection / cleaning / processing costs for recycled materials aren't nearly as volatile. I'm pretty sure recycled metals don't have the same issues.

Re: Recycling in America

#63
The container deposit laws pervert the recycling process by taking the only things worth recycling (aluminum cans) out of the single recycle stream.

I have to pay extra for recycling in my town. However, if there wasn't a bottle bill, it would likely be free, as the recycling companies would gladly take all recyclables in exchange for the aluminum cans.

Re: Recycling in America

#64
post #45

This is the money quote: Coca-Cola committed to using at least 25% recycled plastic in its containers by 2015, but revised this downwards owing to scarce supply and high costs. There is no financial incentive to use recycled goods. They cost more than 'fresh' goods, they require additional processing, they add risk from material contamination (not biologic, structural and chemical). There are a dozen different reason…

where you could hire anyone from students, to sex-offender ex-Cons, to the mentally impaired ... Are you suggesting forced labor camps even for mental patients and other disadvantaged groups in society?

A lot of mentally impaired people are eager for a chance to have work they can handle...along with its associated benefits (something to do, earning money...)

Not all mentally impaired people; there is of course a spectrum.

Re: Recycling in America

#65
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or a mix of both: start charging (more) for waste disposal but make recycling pickup free.

I'm no big fan of taxes and big govt.

How are incentives and tax breaks any less "big government" than a tax itself? You still need an agency to oversee the administration of the incentive and tax break. That argument isn't anti-big government, it's "I don't want to pay for my negative externalities".

Taxes are a cost of doing business. Tax breaks and incentives is unearned income.

Re: Recycling in America

#66

This is the money quote: Coca-Cola committed to using at least 25% recycled plastic in its containers by 2015, but revised this downwards owing to scarce supply and high costs. There is no financial incentive to use recycled goods. They cost more than 'fresh' goods, they require additional processing, they add risk from material contamination (not biologic, structural and chemical). There are a dozen different reason…

Most of the sorting of recycling these days is done by an array of very clever machines, that use e.g. computer vision and blasts of air, or various physical properties to separate out materials.

There are humans involved in various stages, but it's technology that will lead to higher quality, lower price recycled goods particularly as machine sorting makes it easier for consumers to contribute their waste into the system.

Re: Recycling in America

#67

This is the money quote: Coca-Cola committed to using at least 25% recycled plastic in its containers by 2015, but revised this downwards owing to scarce supply and high costs. There is no financial incentive to use recycled goods. They cost more than 'fresh' goods, they require additional processing, they add risk from material contamination (not biologic, structural and chemical). There are a dozen different reason…

Most of the sorting of recycling these days is done by an array of very clever machines, that use e.g. computer vision and blasts of air, or various physical properties to separate out materials. There are humans involved in various stages, but it's technology that will lead to higher quality, lower price recycled goods particularly as machine sorting makes it easier for consumers to contribute their waste into the s…

That sounds interesting, any links?

Re: Recycling in America

#68
post #6

"Most recycled materials should be cheaper than virgin commodities" Surprisingly this just isn't true. It takes a lot of work and chemicals to clean inks and glues out of paper for recycling. Penn & Teller looked into this in an episode of Bullshit! a while back - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rExEVZlQia4 Aluminum and clear glass are very efficient to recycle, plastics and colored glass depend on commodity prices,…

That episode of Bullshit kinda missed the point, IIRC. Energy consumption is an important thing to pay attention to, but the point of recycling is about not taking more stuff out of the ground .

It's also over 11 years old! Just guessing the industry and tech built around recycling has changed a bit.

Re: Recycling in America

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most of the sorting of recycling these days is done by an array of very clever machines, that use e.g. computer vision and blasts of air, or various physical properties to separate out materials. There are humans involved in various stages, but it's technology that will lead to higher quality, lower price recycled goods particularly as machine sorting makes it easier for consumers to contribute their waste into the s…

That sounds interesting, any links?

High speed video of plastic sorting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVZdqWjp7xI

Re: Recycling in America

#70
post #11
post #6

"Most recycled materials should be cheaper than virgin commodities" Surprisingly this just isn't true. It takes a lot of work and chemicals to clean inks and glues out of paper for recycling. Penn & Teller looked into this in an episode of Bullshit! a while back - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rExEVZlQia4 Aluminum and clear glass are very efficient to recycle, plastics and colored glass depend on commodity prices,…

I would believe it. If the problem really is a supply/demand imbalance, the market should correct it. But nobody will pay me for my used plastic bottles.

> But nobody will pay me for my used plastic bottles.

In California and some other US states, you can sell them, though this is in part due to a redemption fee charged when you buy them. Here's a price chart from this year (price per pound):

Aluminum Cans - $1.59 Glass Bottles - $0.104 #1 PETE Plastic Bottles - $1.16 #2 HDPE Plastic Bottles - $0.59 #3 PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) - $0.56 #4 LDPE Plastic Bottles -$2.03 #5 PP Plastic Bottles - $0.60 #6 PS Plastic Bottles - $5.69 #7 Others Plastic Bottles - $0.31 Bimetal - $0.35

This is profitable enough that crews of people come around to steal curbside recyclables in many California cities [1].

[1] http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Battle-brews-over-raiders...

Post reply on HN