That wasn't a nightmare interview; she is clearly unqualified for an analytical role. She should get a job in advertising instead.
My Nightmare Interviews With Google
21–30 of 145 posts
Re: My Nightmare Interviews With Google
#22In engineering school, we got pretty familiar with BOEC (back of the envelope calculations), in some part to give a double check on calculations, and in other part (ahem) to double-check on slide rule calculations and exponent correction. But that is a useful skill, particularly in conjunction with a problem-solving attitude which they repeatedly emphasized us to do. And the book Innumeracy by Paulos gives examples o…
Re: My Nightmare Interviews With Google
#23Re: My Nightmare Interviews With Google
#24That wasn't a nightmare interview; she is clearly unqualified for an analytical role. She should get a job in advertising instead.
Re: My Nightmare Interviews With Google
#25Re: My Nightmare Interviews With Google
#26These seem like soft-ball questions all around. Phone screening is such a pain in the ass, I am surprised that more people don't have a timed web form or similar setup so we can avoid having to waste the hours talking to people that aren't going to make the cut.
chicken/egg... how are you going to know that without talking to them?
However, to that end, could you just raise the bar on the resumes and also the subequent first-round phone screens to reduce the number of 2nd-, 3rd-round interviews? The Google application (for non-college recruits) is already extensive and probably acts as a weed-out mechanism for many people deciding to just apply on a whim.
Re: My Nightmare Interviews With Google
#27That wasn't a nightmare interview; she is clearly unqualified for an analytical role. She should get a job in advertising instead.
Re: My Nightmare Interviews With Google
#28That wasn't a nightmare interview; she is clearly unqualified for an analytical role. She should get a job in advertising instead.
Sounds like that's what she was doing... "Associate Product Marketing Manager"
“Google places four ads per e-mail opened in Gmail. Advertisers get to pick their click-through rates, which can be as little as $0.05...Say each G-mail user opens seven new e-mails a day. They would see 28 ads. If they click on ¼ of those ads, then only seven ads are clicked."
Gmail probably has something like 150 million users, so her figure of 7 ads clicked per user at a minimum of 5 cents a click would result in 52.5 million dollars a day. At some point she should have realized the void between her new analysis and her original $70,000 guess. The whole point of the question is to examine your analytical and estimation skills. The fact that she didn't notice that she was moving towards and answer 750 times the size of the her last one says a lot.
Re: My Nightmare Interviews With Google
#29Her last answer really did her in, I think. She said she was "wishing [the number of graduating seniors] was higher" since she was amid a job search. That would mean more competition for jobs. That indicates a lack of critical thinking skills.
If she thought about her own usage, she'd realize that it was an insanely high number (had she ever clicked on a single gmail ad, let alone 25% of them?).