Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

acuman.us

141–150 of 311 posts

Re: Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought we'd all learned to stop worrying and love descriptivism?

If we are talking about descriptive linguistics "analyzing and describing how language is actually used" as opposed to formal rules ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_description ), then we must also love how the way that I use the English language differs from the way that you use it. And how my well-documented variant works too, and why they differ. I don't use "unique" that way. Do you want "unique" to be j…

> Do you want "unique" to be just a redundant synonym for "different" or not?

I could care less.

Re: Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

#142

It doesn't want to do anything other than ask me A/S/L, even after I tell it! --- Stop asking me where I live! > I'm not really good with locations, so I don't know exactly where you live, but it seems to be Where I Live network. > Do you live in the United States? If so, in which state? I live in Scotland. > Really? You live in scotland? Tell me more about it. > Do you live in the United States? If so, in which stat…

Thank you for checking out ACUMAN.

I have fixed the glitch just now that prevented it from answering those questions normally.

Re: Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

#143

It's an impressive achievement, but I've been around a long time and seen lots of those. It's even more impressive given the age of the dev, and I hope he gets the chance to improve, develop, and contribute to the art and science in general. His bot just said this, though: "It's I know a fair bit." That just screams "Eliza!" to me. I remember implementing Eliza back in 1979, copying the text from a magazine, and then…

Progress isn't just about the upper bounds of human achievement, but also the average. I think it's a mistake to confuse the two, or to place one too high above the other. Of all people you should appreciate that. :) If the next generation tackles calc or recursion even one year earlier or one percentage point more often than yours did, that's a huge cumulative win.

    > "Of all people you should appreciate that."
I do know that - I know that very well. I'm just interested to see that with all the vast amount of progress that has been made, and all the tools available for language analysis, this system still make mistakes like that.

I'd love to see more about how much this is gluing together existing components, and how much is original to the project. Back when I was doing this everything had to be written by hand, from scratch. So much time was spent/wasted in basic, underlying stuff. It's fantastic that people now have so many resources that they don't have to start from so far back, and the inventiveness can shine through.

I'd love to see the inventiveness in this and other projects, but it's hard to see what's really new.

Re: Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

#144
With regards to the survey, would you consider adding a third option to each of the answer sets to cover null cases (i.e. not applicable or insufficient information). Alternatively giving context in which the statement's made (e.g. previous 4/5 comments from both parties) may help.

e.g. "I am a guy"

    -1: inventive/curious
    -2: consistent/cautious
#2 given it's a simple statement with no follow up question.

    -1: efficient/organized
    -2: easy-going/careless
#1 as it's a statement with no fluff or politeness surrounding it.

    -1: outgoing/energetic
    -2: solitary/reserved
Hard to say. I picked #2 as it's a short answer trying to avoid more conversation, but depending on the context could just as easily be #1 (e.g. "Do you like sports?").

    -1: friendly/compassionate
    -2: analytical/detached
As above; opted for 2 because it's a statement of fact (but again, if the previous statement was something like "Do you think Natalie Tran's attractive" it could be #1)

    -1: sensitive/nervous
    -2: secure/confident
This is the hardest one each time. #1 - they're trying to give short answers to move the conversation back to the other person / away from them. #2 - they're not waffling on nervously, but are communicating clear and simple facts (with confidence?).

Re: Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

#146
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pedantic if you like but as with 'pregnant', you can't qualify 'unique'. You either are or you're not.

Nope on both counts. It's a common idiom to say that someone is 'very pregnant'.

There's a perceptual dialectological difference between "hella pregnant" (Northern California) and "totally pregnant" (Southern California).

Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal? The Perceptual Dialectology of California

http://eng.sagepub.com/content/35/4/325.abstract

http://people.duke.edu/~eec10/hellanorcal.pdf

This study provides the first detailed account of perceptual dialectology within California (as well as one of the first accounts of perceptual dialectology within any single state). Quantitative analysis of a map-labeling task carried out in Southern California reveals that California's most salient linguistic boundary is between the northern and southern regions of the state. Whereas studies of the perceptual dialectology of the United States as a whole have focused almost exclusively on regional dialect differences, respondents associated particular regions of California less with distinctive dialects than with differences in language (English versus Spanish), slang use, and social groups. The diverse sociolinguistic situation of California is reflected in the emphasis both on highly salient social groups thought to be stereotypical of California by residents and nonresidents alike (e.g., surfers) and on groups that, though prominent in the cultural landscape of the state, remain largely unrecognized by outsiders (e.g., hicks).

[...]

By far, the most frequently remarked-upon slang term in the map-labeling data was hella, accounting for 47.4 percent of the slang and other lexical labels. Hella is a slang term originating in Northern California and one that remains—aside from a few brief moments in the national spotlight due to its circulation in popular culture— largely restricted to that region (Bucholtz 2006). The term, which apparently lexicalized from (a) hell of (a), functions as both a quantifier (There were hella people there) and an intensifier (He runs hella fast). Four respondents also mentioned the slang term hecka, the G-rated equivalent of hella, but this term was not counted separately, because tokens of hecka always co-occurred with hella. For Southern Californians in particular, hella represents a crucial shibboleth separating the two major regions of the state. As shown in Figure 7, respondents tended to identify hella overwhelmingly as a Northern California slang term, and its appearance in other regions of the map drops dramatically from north to south. Thus Northern California was variously labeled the hellas, Land of the Hella’s, and Hella capital, and one respondent provided an isogloss designating “the ‘hella’ line.” (In the map data, the Central Coast around Santa Barbara seemed to be the dividing line between users and nonusers of hella, and the fact that the study was conducted in this region may have enhanced respondents’ focus on this particular issue.) [*10: The respondent’s confusion may also be due to the existence of the Crips, a notorious Los Angeles–based gang.] Hella users were also negatively evaluated by Southern Californians, and the term came in for a good deal of criticism, such as Hella is not a real word and [hecka is] probably the worst word ever.

Re: Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

#147

With regards to the survey, would you consider adding a third option to each of the answer sets to cover null cases (i.e. not applicable or insufficient information). Alternatively giving context in which the statement's made (e.g. previous 4/5 comments from both parties) may help. e.g. "I am a guy" -1: inventive/curious -2: consistent/cautious #2 given it's a simple statement with no follow up question. -1: efficien…

Thank you for participating in the survey, first of all!

I'll consider implementing one of those options. Thank you for your feedback.

Re: Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

#149

It's an impressive achievement, but I've been around a long time and seen lots of those. It's even more impressive given the age of the dev, and I hope he gets the chance to improve, develop, and contribute to the art and science in general. His bot just said this, though: "It's I know a fair bit." That just screams "Eliza!" to me. I remember implementing Eliza back in 1979, copying the text from a magazine, and then…

While I understand where you are coming from, obviously the bot is not flawless, but it is ridiculous to compare our technology today to Eliza. ACUMAN uses a wealth of knowledge bases and natural language processing to comprehend and accurately give responses. Obviously, the field is invariably complex, but I find it absurd to say that it has increased so little, considering that it was never dreamed of that a bot wo…

From the two responses I've had it would seem that my comment is going to be misunderstood and misinterpreted. Fair enough. I could write essays on this (in fact, I have when I took Philosophy as a minor to accompany my Pure Maths and Computer Science courses) and comments here just aren't going to cut it.

As I say, fair enough.

The responses I'm getting from it have a consistent feel. They are either reciting facts, or they are totally non-committal. Here:

    "I don't like picking favorites. Everything
     that is something regarded with special favor
     or liking seems good to me."
That has all the feeling of a canned response.

I know the advances that have been made, I know how impressive this thing actually is, I know how hard it is to do this, and I know the work that must have gone into it. And even knowing all of that, when it makes what are to humans trivial grammatical mistakes, it takes away from all that and reduces it to a machine.

My comments are not intended to diminish the accomplishment, but to highlight a place where the illusion gets broken. If you have a large, totally white canvas with one small, off-center black dot, what will people look at?

So please understand that this is not a dismissal of the work, or of the achievement, but a highlighting of one specific point that disproportionally detracts from the effectiveness.

To continue to provide feedback to try to help, it just rendered like this:

http://www.solipsys.co.uk/images/acuman.png

Latest Firefox on latest Ubuntu. edit: That's just a grab of part of the screen, I can do the whole window if you'd like to see the context.

Edit: It would be nice to have some details about how it is doing what it's doing. They might be there, but I haven't had time to rummage much, as I'm in the middle of other things. Someone mentioned AIML. I will be back to look again later.

Re: Show HN: I'm a 14 year-old dev who has programmed an artificial intelligence bot

#150

If you look at the source its using something called blekko.php - which upon googling heads to a "IBM Watson purchased this". Is this using watson behind the scenes?

No - if you look up Blekko (which is a regular web search engine which had a free API), it just shut down (which is actually a bad thing for me). I was using it for researching and corroborating web results, which hinders part of the functionality of my bot.

Blekko was just bought by IBM a few days ago, so to answer your question, my bot does not use IBM's APIs. My bot was using it for web results, but now it doesn't work. I'm trying to find a free web search API as an alternative now that Blekko is shut down.

Post reply on HN