Live data from Hacker News

New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

blog.ycombinator.com

571–580 of 673 posts

Re: New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

#571
post #447

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Theatre Sports (competitive collaborative dramatic improvisation) has the concepts of offer , accept , and block . Accepting an offer means to build on it in some way, as a real part of the scene - in the way you mean. A block is when you ignore or undermine the offer , denying it instead of building on it. There's temptation to do so for a cheap laugh. The uncharitable negativity of HN seems similar.

One thing that took me a while to understand as a player - accepting doesn't always mean ignoring conflict. If you offer me something, I accept that your version of reality is true; I don't have to agree with specific parts of it. For example, if someone starts a scene with "Isn't it lovely to be here in Paris?", I accept that we are in Paris, but I don't have to think it's lovely. The takeaway from this to non-impro…

Accepting means logging|auditing?

Re: New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

#572
I like this policy. I think it'll help encourage positivity in a field which can often receive harsh critique. Bullying, especially cyber-bullying has never been an easier, faceless crime that we have to unite to stand up against. Good on you Y-Combinator for leading the efforts.

Mr Zuckerberg and his team must have had similar conversations at Facebook when people keep asking him about whether or not to add a 'dis-like' button. He said publicly that although he did not agree with a thumbs down button, he did see a need for another button which would acknowledge a post.

Say for example, if someone posts about bereaving a lost loved one. Others may not want to hit a 'like' button in that context but would love to hit an alternative 'acknowledge / agree' button.

Re: New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

#573
post #215
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a sneaking suspicion that maybe, just maybe, the looks of HN have helped protect the community against trolls. Everybody knows internet commenting is crude, rude and awful more often than not. In my opinion HN is a glorious example of an online community done right and I'm not sure we should change the site. But who knows, maybe it will even be better if it gets a little make-over.

Trolls exist on HN, I assure you. They're not scared off by the simplicity of the layout.

They exist but they are not that many. The spartan layout might be one reason.

Re: New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

#575
post #434
post #416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Push harder, folks, I'd like to see this one at the very bottom :)

I∫ will race you. =∫∫ ∫og will race log. Maybe empathy karma will come around. Empathy comes and goes, money comes and goes, karma comes and goes. Sadly it hurts when it is accellerated by force of will to determine a ruler and winner to feel good versus bad about. Fog of war is very real for hacked news logy, where edit change commit revision history is basic needs remorse remotely administrated by the "unsayable tr…

How true :/

Re: New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

#576
post #575
post #434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I∫ will race you. =∫∫ ∫og will race log. Maybe empathy karma will come around. Empathy comes and goes, money comes and goes, karma comes and goes. Sadly it hurts when it is accellerated by force of will to determine a ruler and winner to feel good versus bad about. Fog of war is very real for hacked news logy, where edit change commit revision history is basic needs remorse remotely administrated by the "unsayable tr…

How true :/

til True. :∫

One day we can log til.

Maybe.

Re: New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

#577
post #418
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is actually possible to get e-mail notifications via this external service: http://hnnotify.com/

However, that still makes it a conscious choice to engage with the service that way - the default way is still checking back, and that shapes the general usage patterns of the site, even if some people have concluded it benefits them more to modify their experience.

Yes, good point.

Re: New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

#579
post #549
post #541

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I meet people here fine, some people treat me human. But I/we face a trauma 51% attack. Marginality breaks unconscious voting. I am beaten being treated as a child for saying pain while everyone counts pay to be called adult. I have plenty of appropriate help, what I do not have here is an account that survives talking about #Traumahack #Painhack #Centhack without losing my accounts because people use votes to sort f…

I think if you're losing accounts it might be because those accounts haven't been using the site appropriately. Anyone dealing honestly with pain has my profound respect, but that doesn't mean it's on topic here, or that it's ok to make dozens of posts about it.

Losing and paining emotional accounts is severe and inappropriate for power structures and power codes that can easily handle logging our real life data better than calling a memory error.

Re: New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

#580
post #544

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you. I don't participate enough to be able to have a downvote option but I've seen how a different viewpoint (mainly one that doesn't align with HN demographics) will often get downvoted and, even though this site seems much better than others in that regard, it will still discourage anyone from posting anything they might consider controversial. Of course, any comment about downvotes is also, understand…

...and you got downvoted. It's absolutely ridiculous that a forum like HN supposedly frequented by the best and brightest has so many immature children.

I've lost almost all of my karma on this thread and not a single comment as to why I'm being downvoted (-7 points or so). The original article is right that HN has become an incredibly negative community. Downvoting is the internet equivalent of saying "fuck you." So many people want to tell me to shut up but no one will actually say one word why?
Post reply on HN