Live data from Hacker News

10X Programmer and Other Software Engineering Myths

blog.fogcreek.com

1–10 of 84 posts

Re: 10X Programmer and Other Software Engineering Myths

#2
I think like a lot of myths, there is a kernel of truth in the 10x programmer myth.

The fact is, some problems are hard. Some problems are beyond the grasp of some developers. Even given unlimited time an individual may not ever accomplish the goal. I can certainly think of problem sets where that is true of myself.

In those specific circumstances, that person can be considered a "10x programmer" when compared with another.

Re: 10X Programmer and Other Software Engineering Myths

#5
post #3

I love these videos, but the production values are terrible. Invest in a good camera and microphone setup.

Sorry about that, we're trialing some new software which will help improve future videos. For now, hopefully, the transcript will fill any blanks.

Re: 10X Programmer and Other Software Engineering Myths

#6
I believe not only in 10X programmers, but in 1000X programmers. I work with a senior lead developer who has decades of experience, but asks for help with the most trivial issues (like, how an overridden method would behave and how to call the parent class implementation.)

I also firmly believe copy-pasting should be disabled on sites like Stack Overflow.

Re: 10X Programmer and Other Software Engineering Myths

#9

He doesn't say that the 10x programmer is a myth. Just that there isn't academic research that proves it to be true, which hardly means that it's wrong.

The real question is if we should expect their to be evidence behind it. And considering the funding, the opprotunities for research, the difficulty of doing a study someone won't easily pick apart, and the community push to verify it at a peer reviewed level, I am not surprised we don't have peer reviewed research.

For starters, I've yet to see a good way to measure productivity.

Post reply on HN