Live data from Hacker News

WebPurify Profanity Filter, Image Moderation, Video Moderation APIs

webpurify.com

1–10 of 13 posts

Re: WebPurify Profanity Filter, Image Moderation, Video Moderation APIs

#2
Demo page:

http://www.webpurify.com/features/

Well, it passes the "Scunthorpe" test for that word at least.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe_problem

Oddly, it flags "sex" as profanity while finding "rape" not profanity. "sexual" is fine though. I found a false positive -- "cornhole" -- which is a sport most popular in the Midwest:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornhole

It also handles the "space in a swear word issue".

Re: WebPurify Profanity Filter, Image Moderation, Video Moderation APIs

#4
Cool, I actually am on a project that needs exactly this. However, I find the pricing for profanity confusing. Per simultaneous requests is a bit strange and makes it hard to determine what we need. I think you should consider doing it by total volume, with some sort of automatic rate limiting if you must.

Re: WebPurify Profanity Filter, Image Moderation, Video Moderation APIs

#6

Demo page: http://www.webpurify.com/features/ Well, it passes the "Scunthorpe" test for that word at least. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe_problem Oddly, it flags "sex" as profanity while finding "rape" not profanity. "sexual" is fine though. I found a false positive -- "cornhole" -- which is a sport most popular in the Midwest: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornhole It also handles the "space in a swear word…

Upper Dicker, Lower Dicker and Cocking all get through as well.

Titty Hill - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titty_Hill - does unfortunately trigger the filter.

Re: WebPurify Profanity Filter, Image Moderation, Video Moderation APIs

#7
Does anyone have experience with alternative services that provide this? CrowdFlower used to offer image moderation (http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/21/crowdflower-rtfm-2-0/) but they killed the product 18 months ago.

I realize you can build this with Mechanical Turk, etc, but am specifically interested in ones that offer out-of-box nudity detection.

Re: WebPurify Profanity Filter, Image Moderation, Video Moderation APIs

#8
Hey Everyone,

I'm Jon (CTO) of WebPurify. I wanted to answer some of your questions.

1) There will be false positives and negatives with any profanity filter, we just try our best to minimize these. Our filter's algorithm is based on several years of feedback from our customers and you have the options of adding words to your custom allow/reject lists.

2) Most of the alternative image and video moderation services use crowdsourcing, which we have found to be generally inaccurate, not to mention there are security issues.

We have dedicated teams.

3) Simultaneous connections means the number of open connections you can have to our service at any one time. We chose this pricing model because it takes far more processing time to filter 100,000 characters than it does to filter 10 characters.

So basically, the longer the text you filter, the fewer requests you can make in a given period of time.

4) Our Video Moderation API will be publicly available in the next few months, until then contact sales@webpurify.com if you would like to discuss a custom project.

As always our Support Team (support@webpurify.com) is available to answer any questions you may have.

Thanks!

Re: WebPurify Profanity Filter, Image Moderation, Video Moderation APIs

#9

Hey Everyone, I'm Jon (CTO) of WebPurify. I wanted to answer some of your questions. 1) There will be false positives and negatives with any profanity filter, we just try our best to minimize these. Our filter's algorithm is based on several years of feedback from our customers and you have the options of adding words to your custom allow/reject lists. 2) Most of the alternative image and video moderation services us…

Do you really have people working 24x7 whose sole jobs are to look at images? Is approved or denied within a few seconds, or are they checking in batches? If I send 1000 images at once, how long would it take to hear back about all of them?

Re: WebPurify Profanity Filter, Image Moderation, Video Moderation APIs

#10
post #6

Demo page: http://www.webpurify.com/features/ Well, it passes the "Scunthorpe" test for that word at least. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe_problem Oddly, it flags "sex" as profanity while finding "rape" not profanity. "sexual" is fine though. I found a false positive -- "cornhole" -- which is a sport most popular in the Midwest: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornhole It also handles the "space in a swear word…

Upper Dicker, Lower Dicker and Cocking all get through as well. Titty Hill - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titty_Hill - does unfortunately trigger the filter.

Scrotum is marked as profane too, when I am not sure it should be.
Post reply on HN