Live data from Hacker News

Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

class-central.com

41–50 of 92 posts

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#41
The thing that bothers me more is how many of these MOOCS require you to sign up to be able to watch the lectures. Sometime I would just like to watch some of the lectures and not have to bother with assignments and quizzes.

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#42

Simply: The average person can read at ~300 words per minute, and listen at ~150 words per minute. I'm not a big fan of video as a tool for conveying information in general. Not only can I read faster than I can listen, but I can skim and skip around as well. There are situations where video is the best way to impart certain information, but those seem to be the rare cases. I hate it when websites make me sit through…

I've started many MOOC's but never finished because I couldn't keep up with watching the videos. Not being able to flip back and forth is really limiting. The only courses[1] I've finished had good quality notes and completely depended on them and avoided the lecture videos.

[1]: Roughgarden's Algorithms part I, Programming Languages by Dan Grossman and Machine Learning by Andrew Ng.

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#43
post #39
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a little surprised at the strong support this comment has driven. Haha, I usually use this account for opinions that I would think controversial.

I see this opinion voted to the top of Hacker News all the time. People seem to forget that watching something in video format is just so damn convenient, and requires little effort.

Not sure about your definition of convenient, but to me, time is king.

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#44
post #39
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a little surprised at the strong support this comment has driven. Haha, I usually use this account for opinions that I would think controversial.

I see this opinion voted to the top of Hacker News all the time. People seem to forget that watching something in video format is just so damn convenient, and requires little effort.

If it's a technical subject and something genuinely new for the viewer/reader, comprehension and learning are probably the bottlenecks, not ease of consumption.

If this opinion is popular, maybe there's a good reason for it?

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#45
post #36
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed, I would be more inclined to watch videos if they were highly edited. If you want to watch a MOOC on linear algebra the videos you will find are little more than a camcorder stuck in the corner of a classroom and dumped online. For a topic that really doesn't change decade after decade at some point someone is going to come along and produce a highly edited video that contains all of the key points, presented…

Despite being relatively early and ad hoc, Khan academy got it mostly right: don't just tape someone giving a lecture; give a close up of the instructor writing out the logical profession of ideas. In a classroom, it's too hard to do it fast enough; they either have to write very little, or use static slides. Khan wisely used the virtual whiteboard, in effect, to accelerate the writing speed while having infinite spa…

Exactly. I used KA to review some differential calculus and was surprised to see how effective the basic chalk-to-the-blackboard (digital pen, in this case) approach still was.

It is also the reason why I prefer MIT's OCW video lectures over their edX ones. I like how most of the lecturers often take the time to write down the terms and ideas on the blackboard in the old-school way.

I find learning that way helps drive home the concept in a more concrete way than flipping slides with voice-over. I believe this is especially important in case of subjects like math where 'doing' is perhaps the only effective way I am aware of learning the material.

But then again, it may just be me.

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#46
post #39
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a little surprised at the strong support this comment has driven. Haha, I usually use this account for opinions that I would think controversial.

I see this opinion voted to the top of Hacker News all the time. People seem to forget that watching something in video format is just so damn convenient, and requires little effort.

Watching a video does require little effort, but learning -- and subsequently retaining anything is where the real effort is required with technical subjects.

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#47
This reminds of the blog post by Adam Brimo, the founder of OpenLearning (http://www.openlearning.com) - a MOOC startup heavily focused around creating communities. It's short, so I'll just post it here:

--BEGIN POST-- Every profession and every professional engages with teaching and learning in some capacity. Yet many individuals go through university or higher education degrees and fail to learn to their full potential.

Why?

Because the learning environment is focused on content delivery. In both online and offline educational settings, the structure of teaching and learning is primarily instructional: the lecturer delivers content and the student passively receives it. Lectures and tutorials are teacher-centred and teacher-directed; the teacher possesses the knowledge and power within the learning environment. There is rarely peer-to-peer learning, nor student handover or empowerment within the learning process.

This of course incites some level of learning – if it didn’t, we would all still be stuck in first-year university – but it doesn’t promote that deep, conceptual understanding of a learning area that is the hallmark of rich learning.

Despite the pervasiveness of the instructional model within higher education, how people learn best isn’t through passively receiving content. Rich learning occurs when students actively construct their own knowledge and understanding; when they connect new information with their own world and when they are intrinsically motivated in the process. This deep learning also happens through interaction, discussion and collaboration with others.

Think about a topic you’re most excited and passionate about. Do you want to be actively involved in your own learning process? Do you want to discuss and share your experiences of the topic with your peers? Do you want to connect new knowledge with your current awareness through real world examples, to develop that deeper understanding? Do you want to be intrinsically motivated to learn? Do you want to be empowered?

Or do you want to passively listen to an expert deliver a lecture?

OpenLearning wants to change the current model of higher education, to align with how students really learn. We’re about empowering students in their learning process; where learners can actively construct their own knowledge that is relevant and meaningful to them.

We provide an online learning environment that fosters deep learning, intrinsic motivation and collaboration with other students. We promote dynamic communication through fun and interactive learning communities; where students can discuss concepts, share relevant and meaningful media, and provide peer review, support and feedback in a safe and positive learning space. We are both the Learning Environment and the Student Hangout. Traditional educational models see these as mutually exclusive entities; we see them as the same thing.

Students love doing courses through our platform, because we speak in their language. Individuals and organisations love running courses through our platform, because students are engaged, intrinsically motivated and productive.

The OpenLearning philosophy promotes a lifelong love of learning that facilitates students reaching their full learning potential. --END POST--

Full Disclosure: I work at OpenLearning.

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#48
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see this opinion voted to the top of Hacker News all the time. People seem to forget that watching something in video format is just so damn convenient, and requires little effort.

Watching a video does require little effort, but learning -- and subsequently retaining anything is where the real effort is required with technical subjects.

I totally disagree in some cases. I despise internet video most of the time, unless I really need an illustration.

A great example is news sites creating ~1 minute videos instead of just printing out the story. News is almost always better to read than to wait for a person to say it to me in a video.

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#49
post #15

Recently completed MITx 600.001 which had a fair share of lectures along with a textbook. The lectures were mostly just a rehashing of what was presented in the book but there was something about watching the code run that really made a difference. I also think that having "finger exercises" after a short video explaining a concept is quite helpful. Although it seems that could easily be achieved in book format as we…

My favorite thing about the MITx MOOCs are that they have really well-designed, carefully-devised problem sets, which I think might be the most important factor of a great class.

Re: Why My MOOC Is Not Built on Video

#50
Some MOOC have both video and PDF slides. I remember a computer graphic corse on Coursera. The videos were obviously useful in many ways but the PDFs were better for finding the formulas when doing the tests.
Post reply on HN