Make This in an Hour
71–80 of 103 posts
Re: Make This in an Hour
#72I feel like with Godaddy hosting I could make a website in like 2 minutes by pressing a few buttons.
Re: Make This in an Hour
#73I feel like with Godaddy hosting I could make a website in like 2 minutes by pressing a few buttons.
Sorry, bit of a personal rant at my first GoDaddy experience.
Re: Make This in an Hour
#74Re: Make This in an Hour
#75I feel like with Godaddy hosting I could make a website in like 2 minutes by pressing a few buttons.
Yep but you wouldn't get free hosting right?
But for sure, nothing wrong with this info...it's cool how the OP set things up for his solution.
Re: Make This in an Hour
#76err, or you could just upload index.html to any shared hosting in 5 minutes? The trouble of making a site (at least for people who can edit html directly, as in this example) is not about how to do it, but about high expectations and standards that we impose on ourselves... I'm guilty of this mysqlf, my site hasn't been updated in like 5 years, and I've built dozens of sites for others in that period...
I've found that it helps to start with the content first. Whenever I've tried to create a site where there was no content it felt really overwhelming since it's difficult to figure out how to present things nicely when you have no idea what you're trying to present! Of course, if it's your first personal site you very likely don't have much content for it, so it's a bit of a catch-22.
Re: Make This in an Hour
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
The OP's one-hour recipe is strictly better for a pure static site, because it's substantially cheaper than shared hosting (which is $5/mo, github pages is free). Note that shared hosting provides persistent compute/store capability, which this project doesn't need.
> The OP's one-hour recipe is strictly better for a pure static site But it's still a lot worse than the simple web page builders (using a web-based UI) that have been around for 15 years or so. Why not just use about.me or some similar modern service?
Re: Make This in an Hour
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The OP's one-hour recipe is strictly better for a pure static site But it's still a lot worse than the simple web page builders (using a web-based UI) that have been around for 15 years or so. Why not just use about.me or some similar modern service?
Because we are software engineers and website designers and we can do better... (Please don't look at my website...)
Re: Make This in an Hour
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're blaming the students. Is it a possibility that the fault lies with you?
Obviously the fault lies with me. The problem I'm having is exactly the question I opened with: where do you draw the line? How do you draw the line? At what point do you say "You know what, a beginner should know this"? Or whatever the specific level you decide to teach at. Personally I try to teach at levels above beginner. This only makes the line blurrier because there's no clear divide between someone who kinda…
You could try to be romantic and playful and say the love child created by a sexy, error-free relationship between source code and the compiler is an executable?
Re: Make This in an Hour
#80I really like that idea and I understand that this is aimed specifically at the friend mentioned on the site so it takes their technical ability into account but I think for most people who are struggling with basic tasks like these instructions like > Create a directory to hold your website and cd into it. would already confuse them. Now that you already got that nice domain I think I'd be great to have a guide like…
I also built a tutorial around the same idea a few weeks ago, with a similar domain name, but aimed more at complete beginners than this site. My target audience would be graphic designers who want to get into web design, but don't have a clue where to start. I stopped after writing one article because I didn't get much interest, but then I didn't put much work into publicising it either. If people found it useful I'…