Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
1–10 of 75 posts
Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#2This raises the obvious question, then who is going to pay for them?
Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#3This read like an ad for Telegram.
Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#4This raises the obvious question, then who is going to pay for them?
Who pays for e-mail?
Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#5Woah. Hardcore encryption? Is that even better than military grade encryption?
Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#6Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#7This raises the obvious question, then who is going to pay for them?
Who pays for e-mail?
E-mail is an open protocol, but clients and hosting are generally not free. You can pay for them, or you can subscribe to ad-supported services where they data-mine your inbox so they can target ads to you. But someone is paying for it.
Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#8Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#9Woah. Hardcore encryption? Is that even better than military grade encryption?
I don't think any reasonable person would refer to Telegram's horrific chimera as "hardcore encryption."
Re: Messaging apps shouldn't make money – Pavel Durov and Telegram
#10This read like an ad for Telegram.
Yeah, but everything's true. Encrypted by default, huge bounty for security researches, fast, great cross platform apps.