Live data from Hacker News

Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

sublimetext.com

161–170 of 190 posts

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're happy with emacs or vim then you probably shouldn't use it. Many people aren't comfortable with those two or prefer a mouse based approach without the overhead of an IDE in which case Sublime is a pretty good choice with lots of customizability and available plugins. Edit: For me I do my coding/most everything in vim but if I get a new project I have to learn about I find it much more easy to navigate an un…

I really disagree with the characterisation that it is for people who "prefer a mouse based approach." I hardly ever touch the mouse while using it. For me, the thing that sets sublime apart from vim and emacs is the fact that it is a full gui app. Things like go to definition, autocomplete, build panel, command pallete, sidebar, context menus, are all technically possible in vim, but hacking these features into a co…

>For me, the thing that sets sublime apart from vim and emacs is the fact that it is a full gui app. Things like go to definition, autocomplete, build panel, command pallete, sidebar, context menus, are all technically possible in vim, but hacking these features into a command line interface always ends up seeming clunky, confusing and slow.

I can't speak for vim, but Emacs is also a "full gui app." It has go to definition (in fact, I wouldn't be surprised if this idea was invented in some incarnation of Emacs), autocompletion, and various other such features like gdb integration and build message hyperlinking. The discoverability argument applies as well.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#162

Does anyone know if the Sublime Text 2 plugins are compatible with version 3? I've never done a Sublime Text upgrade. TIA! Edit: seems like they will need to be ported [0]. http://www.sublimetext.com/blog/articles/sublime-text-3-beta

In case you haven't stumbled upon it yourself, here [0] is a site I found very useful when I upgraded a while back.

It allows you to check which plugins are supported (and which aren't) by copying and pasting the contents of your package control user settings.

[0]: http://www.caniswitchtosublimetext3.com

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Or maybe I've just been unlucky/incompetent. Every lint extension I've seen seems to drag a full install of whatever the popular implementation of the language is.

All the ones I use (cppcheck, jshint, jsxhint, ruby, clang) require that you have the toolchains already installed. Seems like a pretty consistent design. Those are the official linters [1], though. Edit: Checked a bunch of the others, including those for Lua, XML and Python. None of them come bundled with the underlying tool. [1] https://github.com/SublimeLinter

You appear to be correct- my remark was based on what I guess is out of date experience.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#164

Besides Firefox, Sublime Text is the application I use the most in my day-to-day professional life. It is faster and easier to configure than any other code editor I've used in the past. I would say it's one of the few pieces of software I've encountered that is a joy to use. If you also use ST regularly and can afford it, I highly encourage you to support development and buy a license right now.

(web dev here) I ditched my long loved Eclipse for Sublime 2 months ago and never looked back.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#166

Besides Firefox, Sublime Text is the application I use the most in my day-to-day professional life. It is faster and easier to configure than any other code editor I've used in the past. I would say it's one of the few pieces of software I've encountered that is a joy to use. If you also use ST regularly and can afford it, I highly encourage you to support development and buy a license right now.

I purchased the licence years ago and used it almost exclusively until I got familiarized with vim. It's way more powerful and can do anything that sublime can. Plus more.

The only downside is the learning curve, but you only go through it once.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#167
post #13

After years of using it, I finally just bought a Sublime license. It's about as close to perfect as an editor gets for me - fast, stable, powerful, extensible, portable, and very low cognitive overhead. Kudos to the Sublime folks.

[deleted]

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#168
post #62

Sorry for bring this up , but this is my honest question , why should I use sublime ? what is specific about it ? Let me explain , If I wanna text editor there is Emacs ( and vim for vim user's ) , and if I want to have specific feature like IDE's have (auto complete , GUI debugger etc ) , then I can use Qt Creator/Code Blocks/etc (which I don't need , Because I am not IDE user) , then Why should I use sublime , It d…

This question is pretty much like a vim user asking why he should use emacs (or viceversa). Sure, they cover a lot of common features each, plus their big differences.

Sublime is just another alternative. No real reason to use it if you prefer what you already have. It's just a matter of trying it out and seeing how it works for you.

Note: I no longer use sublime. vim+ctrlp+other plugins has replaced it for me.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#170
post #110

I see lots of comments from people saying that after years of usage they just recently bought a license. I'm curious what most people are using it for, since the license clearly states that you need to buy a copy for professional use.

Most of the people I know have never bought a Windows license for their desktops.

Heck, TBH, the only people I know personally that have licensed windows copies have them on their laptops. (and I know plenty of people who use Windows).

Why would it surprise you that people use sublime in non-compliance with its EULA?

Post reply on HN