Slightly off topic, but does anybody know why the OpenBSD community has started using Comic Sans in all their material? Is it some kind of inside joke? I don't find it neither good nor wrong, but there must be some reason behind it.
I remember Bob Beck saying it was one of the three fonts that works with MagicPoint and the one that is most readable on projector.
Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
21–30 of 45 posts
Re: Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
#22> Random PIDs > Eliminates race conditions > Say you have a root daemon that forks then the child drops privileges. If you can beat the child you can inherit root privileges Can someone explain this? I don't see what this has to do with the randomness of pids.
Re: Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
#23Slightly off topic, but does anybody know why the OpenBSD community has started using Comic Sans in all their material? Is it some kind of inside joke? I don't find it neither good nor wrong, but there must be some reason behind it.
Re: Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
#24Slightly off topic, but does anybody know why the OpenBSD community has started using Comic Sans in all their material? Is it some kind of inside joke? I don't find it neither good nor wrong, but there must be some reason behind it.
There was another discussion about it recently on HN, which linked to this: http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan14-libressl/mgp00025.htm...
Re: Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
#25Ummm. Citation needed?
Re: Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
#26"OpenBSD's OpenBGPD responsible for 30% of worldwide BGP communication" Ummm. Citation needed?
Re: Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
#27Slightly off topic, but does anybody know why the OpenBSD community has started using Comic Sans in all their material? Is it some kind of inside joke? I don't find it neither good nor wrong, but there must be some reason behind it.
Re: Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
#28gopher://gopher.anthrobsd.net/
Re: Welcome to OpenBSD [pdf]
#29> Proactive security ●64-bit long long time_t (NetBSD technically did it first) The best kind of first. Joking aside -- why is so much OpenBSD advocacy backhanded like this ? Do the writers not think that OpenBSD can stand on it's own ?
You left off the following bullet point: * NetBSD technically did it first * But OpenBSD is the one who engaged with the rest of the software community to fix bugs that were uncovered Now it doesn't seem so backhanded.