Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

HTML6 proposal for single-page apps without JavaScript

lists.w3.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

91–100 of 177 posts

Re: HTML6 proposal for single-page apps without JavaScript

#91

Post by asimpletune »

I'm pretty sure this is similar to meteor js and transparent reactive programming, except just getting rid of the templates and using html instead. I don't think he realizes it that way, bc he keeps mentioning wanting to not have to use js.

I would be down to have a nice standard way of providing templates , adding onto html thus keeping it backwards compatible but that's it.

what he's proposing could be could be backwards compatible

Re: HTML6 proposal for single-page apps without JavaScript

#93

Post by Drakim »

officialjunk wrote: post #87
thomasahle wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You shouldn't use the upvote button for agreement. On the other hand "+1" and "I agree" and "Well said!" clutter the forum. How do we solve this?

what's wrong with upvoting with agreement?

Upvoting based on "this comment brings up good points and arguments" rather than "this comment says things that I think are true" helps fight against the community becoming an echo chamber.

Re: HTML6 proposal for single-page apps without JavaScript

#94

Post by egeozcan »

preek wrote: post #84
thomasahle wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You shouldn't use the upvote button for agreement. On the other hand "+1" and "I agree" and "Well said!" clutter the forum. How do we solve this?

Honest question: If not for showing agreement, what is the reason for the upvote button?

I thought it meant "nice contribution to the conversation". It's easy to come to this conclusion when you think down-vote means "you're not contributing". I up-voted many comments I totally disagree and down-voted many I agree (because they were unrelated to the discussion). Am I a minority?

Re: HTML6 proposal for single-page apps without JavaScript

#95

Post by ryannevius »

officialjunk wrote: post #87
thomasahle wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You shouldn't use the upvote button for agreement. On the other hand "+1" and "I agree" and "Well said!" clutter the forum. How do we solve this?

what's wrong with upvoting with agreement?

Isn't "good" just as subjective as "things I think are true"?

Re: HTML6 proposal for single-page apps without JavaScript

#99

Post by repsilat »

ryannevius wrote: post #95
officialjunk wrote: post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what's wrong with upvoting with agreement?

Isn't "good" just as subjective as "things I think are true"?

The problem isn't subjectivity, it's groupthink. "Good but wrong" posts are better than "bad but correct".

Re: HTML6 proposal for single-page apps without JavaScript

#100

Post by [deleted] »

preek wrote: post #84
thomasahle wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You shouldn't use the upvote button for agreement. On the other hand "+1" and "I agree" and "Well said!" clutter the forum. How do we solve this?

Honest question: If not for showing agreement, what is the reason for the upvote button?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN