Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your explanation doesn't really make sense. Consider: who would benefit most from the removal of these laws? The obvious answer is the General Motors Corporation. They could own their own dealerships, getting better control of customer experience and a bigger cut of the profits. It's not like they're short on capital such that they would be forced to franchise anyway. As the largest automaker in the world for most of…
I think the ban on self-service fueling is a great idea and I wish more states (beyond Oregon) would do it.
New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
71–80 of 224 posts
Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#72Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would anyone care what I buy with my own money and how I spend my free time if I don't harm others?
I'm concerned that your machine guns have the potential to harm others. The rest though, by all means...
Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#74Why only (4) stores? Why only "zero-emissions" vehicles? There should be zero limitations on direct to consumer sales for any manufacturer of any product.
Texas is talking about doing a similar thing. The bill here would allow Tesla to open "as many as 12 stores in Texas".
Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would you need any kind of such laws in a free market?
Because they would easily put franchise dealers out of business.
While I do think market interventions are sometimes justified, in this case it seems we are protecting dealers for their own sake.
Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#76Why only (4) stores? Why only "zero-emissions" vehicles? There should be zero limitations on direct to consumer sales for any manufacturer of any product.
Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
To get legislation like this passed, you build a coalition. So the consumer protection angle isn't just a guise so much as it is an angle to get the support of consumer-minded legislators. As for whether these justifications are wrong--it's hard to say. From a jobs point of view, it's probably still not a win for NJ for those dealerships to shut down and have NJ money flow over the internet directly to California. Th…
Actually, no extra money will flow from NJ to California. Consumers will pay less for their cars, and the extra $1000-$2000 dealerships make on each car, will remain in the consumer's pocket. This is better on the whole. Dealerships are market inefficiencies, as they create no real value or "wealth"[1]. They give nothing to consumers in return for the $1-$2k extra that consumers pay for each car. [1] As defined by Pa…
This is very surprising complaint to hear - the whole capitalist economy is filled with inefficiencies! (and Paul Graham is hardly saying something novel here).
Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#78Why only (4) stores? Why only "zero-emissions" vehicles? There should be zero limitations on direct to consumer sales for any manufacturer of any product.
Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#79The consensus in NL is that you're better off with a Porsche Panamera than a Tesla, most likely with a less painful (although still painful) amortisation.
Certainly, if you're taller than 180cm, drive before you buy into the hype.
Re: New Jersey legalizes direct Tesla sales
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Jobs" is probably the "official" argument. If the middlemen go extinct, people will lose those jobs.
which never technically existed in the first place for that company, so the "people" who would be out the job, wouldn't have that job in the first place