This article is phrased very awkwardly. It reads like giving away free access to certain sites, is the same as making premium internet access. Am I missing something? Facebook hate aside, this is a change meant to give something away . Right?
Yes, it gives away free access of 38 sites. But by doing so, they also encourage more people to forgo purchasing complete internet plans and hence accessing all of the other millions of websites out there. This indirectly drives traffic to this 38 sites that they’ve picked through a very skewed and opaque process, and undermines the concept of net neutrality.
Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
31–40 of 81 posts
Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#32What's wrong with this? They're not preventing you from paying for Internet access, they're offering some access for free. People in India are free to start competing ISPs.
ISP's have to buy license from government. But a HN post showed a way to tunnel normal traffic through FB chat[ ]. : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9203946
Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#33Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumping_%28pricing_policy%29 for one example of how giving something away for free can be net worse for the economy/world than charging a fair price for it. Another issue is what is given for free. If free access is given to something that is 80% of what they need, people will have reduced incentive to buy 100%, shrinking the market for the 100% solution, raising its price, and keepi…
If you're swayed by that logic, should perhaps Google be forced to charge users for web search, and Android, and their other "free" offerings that put smaller competitors at a disadvantage?
Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#35I don't get it, it is free, and worried about being charged to access it beyond the free version?
Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumping_%28pricing_policy%29 for one example of how giving something away for free can be net worse for the economy/world than charging a fair price for it. Another issue is what is given for free. If free access is given to something that is 80% of what they need, people will have reduced incentive to buy 100%, shrinking the market for the 100% solution, raising its price, and keepi…
If you're swayed by that logic, should perhaps Google be forced to charge users for web search, and Android, and their other "free" offerings that put smaller competitors at a disadvantage?
And of course OpenOffice should be made illegal under that same logic.
Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#37this will create a rat race, there will be big companies like flipkart paytm willing to offer money to Reliance to offer there sites for free. Internet.org is on a path to destroy net neutrality. Reliance has just found 1 way to earn more money without any ethics.
Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#38internet.org (within India) redirects to 0.internet.org, which takes me to 0.internet.org/unavailable with the following message:
>You must be on the Reliance network to use Internet.org. If you'd like to access these websites for free, use a SIM card from Reliance.
This is really getting out of hand.
Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/2x1vWZr.png
Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, it gives away free access of 38 sites. But by doing so, they also encourage more people to forgo purchasing complete internet plans and hence accessing all of the other millions of websites out there. This indirectly drives traffic to this 38 sites that they’ve picked through a very skewed and opaque process, and undermines the concept of net neutrality.
There is no such thing as a free lunch. This is simply an example of this in effect. If people want full internet access.. pay for it. There is no story here.
Re: Internet.org will finish internet the way we know it, hurt India’s growth
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Basic telecommunications infrastructure in India is heavily regulated by a government that once actually proposed banning all VoIP services apart from the ones they offer at premium prices. Thanks to a high degree of corruption and bureaucracy, it is near impossible to enter the ISP game unless you have serious monetary or political clout. Simply starting a competing ISP is not really feasible.
Reliance Communications Ltd must pay those entry costs as well. I don't see why that's relevant to my point at all.