Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Google Cloud Storage Nearline

googlecloudplatform.blogspot.com

1–10 of 188 posts

Re: Introducing Google Cloud Storage Nearline

#5
post #4

from the documentation: "You should expect 4 MB/s of throughput per TB of data stored as Nearline Storage. This throughput scales linearly with increased storage consumption."

There it is. Still, someone like 'cperciva could pool a lot of their customers' data together and offer high speeds even for small amounts of data.

Re: Introducing Google Cloud Storage Nearline

#9
post #5
post #4

from the documentation: "You should expect 4 MB/s of throughput per TB of data stored as Nearline Storage. This throughput scales linearly with increased storage consumption."

There it is. Still, someone like 'cperciva could pool a lot of their customers' data together and offer high speeds even for small amounts of data.

http://xkcd.com/1494/

The unusual thing about this market is that by constantly improving the price point of their product but keeping their profit margins the same, AWS has forced every competitor in it to actually compete at the limits of their capability - so any scheme like this that got any serious traction would presumably be self-undermining. The economists will have considered all of the unused provided capacity in the model before they priced it. Sorry to be miserable ;)

Re: Introducing Google Cloud Storage Nearline

#10
The detailed pricing is at https://cloud.google.com/storage/pricing#nearline-pricing

In short, if I'm understanding correctly:

  $0.01 per GB per month storage
  $0.01 per GB retrieval
  Normal egress fees on top, so additional ~$0.10 per GB if you want to retrieve outside of Google Cloud.
  Early deletion fee. Effectively just a minimum storage charge of 1 month.
It seems this is cheaper than Glacier and quite a bit simpler. The speed restrictions are interesting though.
Post reply on HN