The idea that a startup's end game should be to "build a monopoly" is one of the most profound insights in Thiel's excellent book, Zero to One. This move just deepens YC's monopoly in its domain, as sama would say, "in the Peter Thiel sense."
There's nothing profound about it, it's common sense in business though people use different words like "moats", "barriers to entry" and "pricing power".
Welcome Peter
111–120 of 161 posts
Re: Welcome Peter
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. I have 4 kids, I have been married for 15 and my co-founder had a 3 months old when we did YC. And we are from Portugal, so we were away from our families when we went through YC. It was hard and it required sacrifice, but it was certainly worth it and YC was super supportive. Our lives, and the lives of our kids are much better for it.
You say you disagree, but your experience doesn't support that. "It was hard and it required sacrifice." because of the implicit bias brought up by the GP. For someone in their mid twenties, no relationship or dependents, moving for 3 months is no big deal. Good, even.
Re: Welcome Peter
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's nothing profound about it, it's common sense in business though people use different words like "moats", "barriers to entry" and "pricing power".
For some reason every generation seems to rediscover the same things and think they've invented something new
Re: Welcome Peter
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
> one of the most profound insights in Thiel's excellent book, Zero to One. Which was an insight in Blue Ocean Strategy (Kim & Mauborgne, 2005). And before that, if you squint, in Competitive Strategy (Porter, 1980) and Competitive Advantage (Porter, 1980). And the B-school theorists basically got their ideas by peeking over the fence of the Economics dept at how monopolies are formed and abuse their power and saying…
And before that, Morgan, Rockefeller, etc. And before that, George(s), Charles, Henry, James, Elizabeth, Kahn, Alexander, etc, etc.
Re: Welcome Peter
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
this is not true. an accelerator can do earlier (before team or product or idea); wider (fund literally anyone who can write five pages in English in a timed setting about their idea); lower (take 0.075% for $2k); faster (an SaaS app that wires you a check within 24 hours, after a human lawyer verifies your details and contract); riskier (billion dollar ideas that don't even have the research paper worked out - like…
All those are valid. One you forgot: YC, like nearly all other accelerators, is implicitly age-ist. Note that I said implicitly. There is no explicit age discrimination that I am aware of, but the entire program is structured in a way that makes it horribly impractical for anyone who isn't a bachelor/bachelorette and childless. You must move to the Bay Area, put in family-unfriendly hours, and live on a quantity of m…
The reality is that neither YC, nor the startup world in general, will work for everyone in every life circumstance. You will always have a more difficult road when your personal life imposes constraints upon you that your competitors (in this case, other founders) don't have. But that doesn't mean that YC was designed to leave those over 25 out in the cold. It means that people who are able to dedicate themselves to their startup for 3 months, with constant access to advice from world-class entrepreneurs and investors, and the opportunity to pitch their ideas to every kingmaker VC in the tech world, will have an astronomically higher success rate than others.
Re: Welcome Peter
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those sound pretty damning to me. Especially coming from a billionaire.
Which part of his statement is inaccurate?
Re: Welcome Peter
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd still love to hear Peter Thiel and PG duke it out/reconcile the "choose an idea that avoids competition at all costs" vs. "don't worry about competition at all" messages.
You could look at them as two sides of the same perspective: Paul is saying basically that competition doesn't exist because if you focus on the customer need enough it ensures uniqueness, and Peter is saying don't copy what someone else has done, be unique.
Re: Welcome Peter
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
> one of the most profound insights in Thiel's excellent book, Zero to One. Which was an insight in Blue Ocean Strategy (Kim & Mauborgne, 2005). And before that, if you squint, in Competitive Strategy (Porter, 1980) and Competitive Advantage (Porter, 1980). And the B-school theorists basically got their ideas by peeking over the fence of the Economics dept at how monopolies are formed and abuse their power and saying…
And before that, Morgan, Rockefeller, etc. And before that, George(s), Charles, Henry, James, Elizabeth, Kahn, Alexander, etc, etc.
Thiel suggests becoming a monopoly in a small market and vertically integrating
Re: Welcome Peter
#119Re: Welcome Peter
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
Without additional qualification, "political extremist" just means he holds unpopular views. (What else defines "extreme" in any absolute sense except for what's currently popular?) Turning away potentially strong partners with well-understood and compatible investment philosophies and significant relevant achievements because they hold unpopular views in unrelated arenas is not good policy.
Libertarianism is extremist politics in my view, and a lot of his views seem to align with anarcho capitalists. The only issue he appears to lean left on is conveniently the one that personally affects him.
Diversify all the attribute :-P