Welcome Peter
91–100 of 161 posts
Re: Welcome Peter
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. I have 4 kids, I have been married for 15 and my co-founder had a 3 months old when we did YC. And we are from Portugal, so we were away from our families when we went through YC. It was hard and it required sacrifice, but it was certainly worth it and YC was super supportive. Our lives, and the lives of our kids are much better for it.
I am interested in your story then? Did you incorporate in US and move your family to the US? Did the pressure to do long hours cease once you finished the YC programme and got funding? > Our lives, and the lives of our kids are much better for it. This implies some level of financial success from your participation :-)
I would actually go so far to say that if you are doing a startup and have kids, YC is by far your best chance of creating a successful startup without having to go through financial distress. In that sense it is the most family friendly incubator. Having done 4 startups always with kids, I speak of experience.
Re: Welcome Peter
#93Thiel joining makes YC look like the 1992 Olympics "Dream Team" compared to all of the other accelerators.
Re: Welcome Peter
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. I have 4 kids, I have been married for 15 and my co-founder had a 3 months old when we did YC. And we are from Portugal, so we were away from our families when we went through YC. It was hard and it required sacrifice, but it was certainly worth it and YC was super supportive. Our lives, and the lives of our kids are much better for it.
I didn't mean to imply that nobody with a family could do this, but that it's structured in such a way as to be strongly biased against people with families/kids. How many others did you see in YC with children?
Re: Welcome Peter
#95As time goes on, YC will continue to attract the best people in the valley (both founders and investors). It's a talent singularity.
It's becoming a powerhouse and that usually causes problem in the long run if the chemistry isn't present. Or say the need to be hungry enough to attain goals (just like a strong sports team losing against a lower tier team, aka the underdog). Yes, surrounding yourself with smart people is great, but surrounding yourself with hungry people is another. Otherwise, good luck and more success to YC!
Re: Welcome Peter
#96As time goes on, YC will continue to attract the best people in the valley (both founders and investors). It's a talent singularity.
Re: Welcome Peter
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
All those are valid. One you forgot: YC, like nearly all other accelerators, is implicitly age-ist. Note that I said implicitly. There is no explicit age discrimination that I am aware of, but the entire program is structured in a way that makes it horribly impractical for anyone who isn't a bachelor/bachelorette and childless. You must move to the Bay Area, put in family-unfriendly hours, and live on a quantity of m…
25-30 year olds smart enough to build their own business wouldn't waste their time with YC. Most of the information and knowledge YC provides is openly published for free online. Aside from that the partners are always open to emails and communication. So why waste your money?
Re: Welcome Peter
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
And Drucker's Innovation and Entrepreneurship a bit latter that decade. I recommend all of them and also Porter's 5 forces update article in HBR.
And I won't be surprised if someone pops up with a Sun Tzu quote before long. (I'll leave Ecclesiastes 1:9 as an exercise for the reader.)
Re: Welcome Peter
#99Just finished reading Zero to One for a second-time, and it was interesting to see that Peter Thiel's contrarian approach to investing in startups ("What valuable company is nobody building") is very similar to PG's thesis that "all good ideas look like bad ideas to begin with (black swan investing) [0] It will be even more interesting to see if their combined insights and approach can increase their chances of ident…
I'd still love to hear Peter Thiel and PG duke it out/reconcile the "choose an idea that avoids competition at all costs" vs. "don't worry about competition at all" messages.
Re: Welcome Peter
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am interested in your story then? Did you incorporate in US and move your family to the US? Did the pressure to do long hours cease once you finished the YC programme and got funding? > Our lives, and the lives of our kids are much better for it. This implies some level of financial success from your participation :-)
Doing a startup when you have kids is (almost) always harder. YC actually makes it easier. Since you are more likely to get funding, you can actually pay yourself at least enough that you don't have to worry if you will be able to make rent. There is advantages to it also. When you have kids you are more aware of the consequences of failing, you value your time more and are less likely to "play house" as PG calls it,…
> When you have kids you are more aware of the consequences of failing, you value your time more and are less likely to "play house" as PG calls it, in my opinion.
Yes I agree with this. I think having kids is kind of training for some aspects of start-up life. Definitely in juggling a lot of things at once with limited time.
In terms of success I just wanted to know if it carried on beyond the YC incubator period and it sounds like it has so well done and good luck with it :-)