Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 89 posts

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#51
In all honesty, the way it works is like this -

1. Attractive male opens door for female. Female blushes, there is no problem.

2. Unattractive male opens door for female. Female reports unwanted behavior.

("attractive" does not have to mean "physically attractive", it could be another quality)

And I'm not being smug here with the above. No matter what, life is a popularity contest.

Outside of that example, with grey zones, it's all on a case-by-case bases, as far as what appropriate behavior is.

But if you need an actionable answer, then realizes that right now we are living in a time where victimhood is the predominant social "virtue"... People are seeking it, promoting it, and pretending to be outraged over it (e.g., social justice) - and will do anything to get attention.

So if you are a male, it's best not to have any type of non-work contact and non-work dialog with opposite sex co-workers, unless you want to be the subject of another world-trending tweet and/or 1000 point + 500 reply HN post.

As anything from a simple compliment, to a obvious joke, will be interpreted in the worst of ways.

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#52
post #9

There is an important difference between tech companies and many other kinds of workplaces. Tech has a greater tendency to consume people outside of work. Many go home from a day of programming, and relax by programming open source or hobby projects. They want to socialize with other tech people, because tech is their life. Most other lines of work don't seem to spill out as much from the office, and people in them s…

>>Sometimes I think tech companies should set up some kind of internal dating or matchmaking site, and establish a rule that if an employee is interested in exploring romantic or sexual relationships with coworkers, they have to go through that site.

Tinder for coworkers. This.... is.... brilliant. But for some reason, someone is going to screw it up and it'll be a big fiasco and then the whole thing will be terminated. But seriously, does anyone see any negatives in this idea? I'm just assuming it'd be problematic because I'm conditioned to believe flirting/romance/dating in the workplace, 9 times out of 10, leads to disaster. But is there a more concrete potential event that'd screw this up?

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#53
post #2

I was talking to one of my best friends who also happens to be a coworker the other day, and I said "Hey, if you're ever a victim of sexual harassment, what can I do to make you feel comfortable with coming to me so that I can attempt to help?" She said "Nothing, really. The problem is that most harassment isn't blatant, it is hidden and not obvious. It's like a feeling that you get from someone. I can't tell you how…

Not the same thing (I'm a guy) but a manager of mine had a great solution to a similar situation.

I once had a coworker that said a lot of gross things: racist stuff, creepy sexual stuff, etc. Went on for a while. I told my manager, without naming the other coworker.

My manager sent a memo to the department reminding them about the fact that there were often guests in our area and that we needed to be careful about jokes and language.

It worked. The coworker didn't feel personally blamed or as if somebody ratted him out, and he did cease with the gross stuff. Everybody won, basically. Or at least nobody lost.

Now obviously that kind of oblique approach won't always work and people may need to be dealt with. The next step would have been for my manager or I to speak to him privately.

You could try something like that. Maybe get an outside speaker to talk to the team, just to give some reminders about specific things to avoid such as staring at womens' chests?

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#54
Ever hear, "don't shit where you eat?"

If you can't get laid at a bar with any degree of regularity, assume your skills are shit and that any sexual interactions at work will turn to shit.

I don't care, tho. I'm a man, I don't turn that off just because I get paid to work at your shitty startup.

I'd rather be fired for having a sex drive than getting paid to be some no-balls eunuch.

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#55
post #20
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've been in situations where people are obviously gawping at me and it's incredibly uncomfortable and it's a much, much different experience than when they're idly looking around a conference room because they're bored. it is your internal interpretation. It may be true or may be not. The point here is that actions - specifically eyes movements - of one persons are supposed to be judged based on interpretation by…

If the lady says people are staring at her boobs, why are you dismissing it with a wave of "internal interpretation"? Why wouldn't you take her at her word?

Why would he take her at her word?

To have diversity we have to have more than the white-knight (that takes all accusations made by females at face value).

I've often glanced and looked downwards when talking to someone (or standing close to someone) for a few seconds at a time - just like 100% of us that don't continually stare people in the eyes like a crazy person.

I'm sure that a "lady" that reports that people are always stating at her breasts is either misinterpreting that downward looking action for something it's really not, or is dressing specifically to show off her goods - which will meet with the other person's eyes inadvertently for a second or two.

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#56
post #44
post #2

I was talking to one of my best friends who also happens to be a coworker the other day, and I said "Hey, if you're ever a victim of sexual harassment, what can I do to make you feel comfortable with coming to me so that I can attempt to help?" She said "Nothing, really. The problem is that most harassment isn't blatant, it is hidden and not obvious. It's like a feeling that you get from someone. I can't tell you how…

this is hard, it depends on the situation. i can relate my one experience of dealing with this where i felt that i had to confront a co-worker for boob staring. it made me feel awkward to sit there and notice him doing it, so the lady involved must have noticed too... i pulled him outside on a false pretense and simply said "stop staring at her tits, its making /me/ feel uncomfortable" and as soon as it was pointed o…

> it is simply true that wearing a low cut top to the office is not suitable attire.

I would tend to agree, but I believe there are many that would consider that comment "blaming the victim", or in other words, any comment at all about a female's appearance is discriminatory.

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#57
post #23
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, there's a difference between looking at someone because they're talking or you're engaging in the meeting with them and staring directly at their boobs. I've been in situations where people are obviously gawping at me and it's incredibly uncomfortable and it's a much, much different experience than when they're idly looking around a conference room because they're bored.

Looking someone continuously in the eyes can also be judged too intense and uncomfortable, and the most natural reaction, at least to me, is to lower your gaze momentarily. This is the thing that (to me, at least) seems least like I'm bored or checking out of the conversation. It is unfortunate that when talking to females, this puts your eyes in the region of their chest, and there have been instances where I've fou…

  It is unfortunate that when talking to females, this 
  puts your eyes in the region of their chest, and there
  have been instances where I've found myself with my eyes
  locked on someone's chest and it's really not the intent.
I get it. This was totally me in high school. Probably in college and beyond a bit, too.

But there are objects in the room besides her eyes and her breasts. Make eye contact, look at something else, eye contact, etc.

Honestly, if all else fails, watch how other people do it. Find a guy who has found a happy medium between "intense and unbroken constant eye contact" and "staring at breasts" and just copy that. I'm not even being sarcastic.

For many engineers this stuff doesn't always come naturally but on the flip side it's all pretty learnable.

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#58
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, there's a difference between looking at someone because they're talking or you're engaging in the meeting with them and staring directly at their boobs. I've been in situations where people are obviously gawping at me and it's incredibly uncomfortable and it's a much, much different experience than when they're idly looking around a conference room because they're bored.

> people are obviously gawping at me and it's incredibly uncomfortable and it's a much, much different experience than when they're idly looking around a conference room because they're bored One thing that makes this challenging is that most men don't know what it's like to be looked at . It's obvious to you because you've likely been a recipient of lots of different kinds of gazes throughout your life and, for bett…

I think that's why this issue will never go away. There are a lot of men that would very much like to be looked at, but unfortunately it seems the genders are wired so fundamentally differently that this problem will always be with us, likely forever, and the best we can do is try to get people to behave "acceptably", often against their natural impulses.

I'd be curious to read if a genuinely honest study has been done in variances internationally - do women in Asian or Latin countries feel as bad when men look at them? Serious question.

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#59
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this is hard, it depends on the situation. i can relate my one experience of dealing with this where i felt that i had to confront a co-worker for boob staring. it made me feel awkward to sit there and notice him doing it, so the lady involved must have noticed too... i pulled him outside on a false pretense and simply said "stop staring at her tits, its making /me/ feel uncomfortable" and as soon as it was pointed o…

> it is simply true that wearing a low cut top to the office is not suitable attire. I would tend to agree, but I believe there are many that would consider that comment "blaming the victim", or in other words, any comment at all about a female's appearance is discriminatory.

it is true. the analogy i like to use (which is quite belittling to men i guess, and very extreme) is being burned by fire.

if you put your hand in fire, you are the victim, but its still your fault when you get burned. the fire isn't going to go cold whatever your intent behind putting your hand in it.

in the same way men will look at exposed cleavage no matter why you are wearing the low cut top. that's just nature, and blaming men for their natural behaviour is no better than blaming the fire for being hot.

the best defence is to not even go there, don't put your hand in fires and don't show your cleavage... i shouldn't have to disregard such straightforward logic because the person i am talking to is a woman. imo that is demeaning to women...

its a dangerous position to take, but for all of the wrong reasons.

(and of course, men can train themselves to not look, and especially not to stare at boobs - the fire can not train itself to be cold)

Re: Ask HN: Non-Sexist Behaviour Guidelines?

#60
post #20
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've been in situations where people are obviously gawping at me and it's incredibly uncomfortable and it's a much, much different experience than when they're idly looking around a conference room because they're bored. it is your internal interpretation. It may be true or may be not. The point here is that actions - specifically eyes movements - of one persons are supposed to be judged based on interpretation by…

If the lady says people are staring at her boobs, why are you dismissing it with a wave of "internal interpretation"? Why wouldn't you take her at her word?

We can't just dismiss people (people) and we can't just take them at their word, either.
Post reply on HN