Live data from Hacker News

USB Killer

kukuruku.co

21–30 of 198 posts

Re: USB Killer

#21
post #9

This reminds me of the Etherkiller page (sending 120 volt to various devices: NICs, HDDs...): http://www.fiftythree.org/etherkiller/

The bus killer on this page is a real work of art, if I remember correctly it kills PCI/AGP/ISA using card covers! (website was down when I clicked)

Re: USB Killer

#22
Someone joked that this would be useful to ensure people won't randomly plug USB drives into their computers. Sounds insane, except that...

"During a stop-over in Hong Kong, he finds a spare USB key in his hotel room. Curious, he inserts it into his laptop. By the time he arrives in Australia, his computer is infected."[1]

This was the one of the infection vectors for a large flare-up between the Chinese government and a number of Australian based mining companies, all well before the Snowden leaks that have only made the world more complex.

Given the choice between frying an employee's USB / computer (small monetary loss) and allowing trade secrets to fall into the hands of competitors / customers (large monetary loss), it's not crazy to opt for the former.

Standard practice has even gone further. A colleague of mine purchases fresh laptops for when he goes overseas and then never uses them again. He doesn't even work in an industry where commercial secrets are common. I'd hope that anywhere that features security implications or commercial secrets would also act at this level.

Perhaps an innocuous version of this, which starts a high pitch whistle, would be useful in a corporate environment. Less destructive but resulting in the the same security awareness.

[1]: http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/special_eds/20100419/cyber/

Re: USB Killer

#23

Is there any chance this could be dangerous to the human and not just his device?

If one wanted something dangerous to humans, one could just pack a USB stick full of explosives and use the current from the port as a detonator. I'm sure that's already been thought of before.

Re: USB Killer

#24
It would be cool to create a version of this that just sounded a really, really loud siren. Then you could leave it lying around the office, and listen out for the bunnies.

Re: USB Killer

#26
The potential damage this implies is ridiculous.

Looks like I'm stocking up on Raspberry Pi-s to deal with my curiosity from now on...

Re: USB Killer

#28
post #24

It would be cool to create a version of this that just sounded a really, really loud siren. Then you could leave it lying around the office, and listen out for the bunnies.

Especially if it used capacitors or an onboard battery to keep the siren going when someone inevitably yanks it out quickly :)

Re: USB Killer

#29
post #4

This is just one of many reasons why you should not ever stick unknown things in your healthy ports (or your healthy things in unknown ports). Not without protection. Safety first. But I'm a firm believer that people should be able to consent to this kind of behavior if they really wish to.

Cheeky. Are USB condoms really worth it? And do they have any that prevent excess current? (I really like sticking things into ports.)

Re: USB Killer

#30
post #4

This is just one of many reasons why you should not ever stick unknown things in your healthy ports (or your healthy things in unknown ports). Not without protection. Safety first. But I'm a firm believer that people should be able to consent to this kind of behavior if they really wish to.

I've often wondered if there was some condom-like* attachment available that acted as a go-between for the USB port and a connected device that would prevent/mitigate some of the issues with sticking unknown devices into ports.

* There is a device called a 'USB Condom' but it's only for charging purposes, and completely restricts data access.

Post reply on HN