Live data from Hacker News

This bakery will hire anyone

grist.org

1–10 of 171 posts

Re: This bakery will hire anyone

#3
In case any is wondering, I looked at the comments under that article and saw the stats:

According to IPCH's Spring 2014 Uncensored Magazine, 35% of open hires make it through Greyston Bakery's apprenticeship program.

Source| http://www.icphusa.org/filelibrary/ICPH_UNCENSORED%205.1_Spr...

Re: This bakery will hire anyone

#5
It is our individual and societal lizard brain that drives our puritan style shying away from "fallen" the way it was reacting toward lepers for centuries and millennia. It takes an intelligent effort to overcome it.

Re: This bakery will hire anyone

#6
tl;dr -> Despite my doubts, Brady makes an interesting argument for open hiring and the social duties of an employer in traditional businesses. Here's the meat of the article:

> “Low-wage workers tend to have a fair amount of turnover — if you make investments in a workforce it’s very difficult to judge if they are going to stay,” Brady said. “So companies try to make as low an investment as possible — and that means they are doing very little to break the chain of poverty.”

Greyston takes the opposite approach.

“Rather than spending money on interviews and background checks, we are spending it on training and development,” he said.

New workers go through an intensive training period and a 10-month apprenticeship. People who aren’t pulling their weight get fired. But there are plenty of workers who do just fine, Brady said.

EDIT: If you downvote, at least write down why.

Re: This bakery will hire anyone

#10

tl;dr -> Despite my doubts, Brady makes an interesting argument for open hiring and the social duties of an employer in traditional businesses. Here's the meat of the article: > “Low-wage workers tend to have a fair amount of turnover — if you make investments in a workforce it’s very difficult to judge if they are going to stay,” Brady said. “So companies try to make as low an investment as possible — and that means…

I suspect the ROI on training is also much higher than it is on interviews and screening (at least for these sorts of entry-level positions).

That's less about social duty, and more about spending money efficiently.

Post reply on HN